2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective analysis of porous tantalum trabecular metal–enhanced titanium dental implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An uncontrolled cross section study observed that Ta dental implants were clinically efficient under diverse clinical conditions [55]. Further clinical research confirmed that Ta implants exhibited less peri-implant bone loss than Ti specimens [56]. Taken altogether, our results give an overview of the healing process of proliferation-differentiation-mineralization around titanium and porous tantalum implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…An uncontrolled cross section study observed that Ta dental implants were clinically efficient under diverse clinical conditions [55]. Further clinical research confirmed that Ta implants exhibited less peri-implant bone loss than Ti specimens [56]. Taken altogether, our results give an overview of the healing process of proliferation-differentiation-mineralization around titanium and porous tantalum implants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…This special geometric structure and strength are of great significance to the biological properties of implanted materials. PTTM has long been used in orthopedics to promote neovascularization, wound healing and osteogenesis, and in recent years, it has been incorporated into Ti alloy dental implants [97][98][99]. In vivo experiments, studies have shown that the bone growth, the amount of new mineralized bone and the rate of new bone formation of Ta trabecular dental implant (TM) is better than that of Ti dental implant (TSV), and TM dental implant has considerable implant stability and bone-implant contact [100,101].…”
Section: Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo experiments, studies have shown that the bone growth, the amount of new mineralized bone and the rate of new bone formation of Ta trabecular dental implant (TM) is better than that of Ti dental implant (TSV), and TM dental implant has considerable implant stability and bone-implant contact [100,101]. At present, many studies have incorporated TM into Ti alloy dental implants to improve osseointegration, and the results show that there is less bone loss around TM implants than the Ti group [99]. Macheras et al analyzed the survival rate of the porous Ta acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and followed up for an average of 18 years.…”
Section: Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immediate loading tests of porous Ta enhanced implants demonstrated significantly less marginal bone loss than that of threaded implants (0.43±0.41 mm Vs 0.98±0.67 mm) after 1-year of functional loading [171]. This result was then further corroborated in a retrospective study in which an average of 0.28 mm bone gain could be found in porous Ta enhanced group, but the Ti group showed an average of 0.2 mm marginal bone loss after 1-year of implant loading [172].…”
Section: Dental Implantsmentioning
confidence: 61%