1996
DOI: 10.1016/0924-9338(96)88783-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrograde amnesia in patients with temporal lobe, frontal lobe and diencephalic lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
107
2
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
17
107
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between the profiles of overall autobiographical memories (AM score) and strictly episodic ones (EM score) highlighted in fv-FTD the difficulty in retrieving truly episodic memories compared with more generic autobiographical ones despite the systematic clues and encouragements to be specific provided in our AM test. This result is consistent with previous studies of patients with non-progressive frontal injury revealing a deficit of executive function and of access to specific anterograde and retrograde autobiographical memories (Baddeley & Wilson, 1986;Della Sala, Laiacona, Spinnler & Trivelli, 1992;Kopelman, Stanhope & Kingsley, 1999;Piolino et al, 2007; for reviews, see Conway and Fthenaki, 2000;Kopelman & Kapur, 2001). The analysis of the different kinds of memories clearly showed that AM retrieval in fv-FTD was characterized by overgenerality, a tendency to recall repeated events (occurring more than one time) or extended events (lasting more than 1 day) rather than specific events.…”
Section: Characteristics and Cognitive Mechanisms Of Am Deficits In Psupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The comparison between the profiles of overall autobiographical memories (AM score) and strictly episodic ones (EM score) highlighted in fv-FTD the difficulty in retrieving truly episodic memories compared with more generic autobiographical ones despite the systematic clues and encouragements to be specific provided in our AM test. This result is consistent with previous studies of patients with non-progressive frontal injury revealing a deficit of executive function and of access to specific anterograde and retrograde autobiographical memories (Baddeley & Wilson, 1986;Della Sala, Laiacona, Spinnler & Trivelli, 1992;Kopelman, Stanhope & Kingsley, 1999;Piolino et al, 2007; for reviews, see Conway and Fthenaki, 2000;Kopelman & Kapur, 2001). The analysis of the different kinds of memories clearly showed that AM retrieval in fv-FTD was characterized by overgenerality, a tendency to recall repeated events (occurring more than one time) or extended events (lasting more than 1 day) rather than specific events.…”
Section: Characteristics and Cognitive Mechanisms Of Am Deficits In Psupporting
confidence: 82%
“…'s personal semantic memory is slightly impaired with no gradient. By contrast, one patient (Eslinger, 1998) had a greater impairment for childhood and early-adult periods; other patients had better remote semantic memory, though their scores were only mildly abnormal (Kopelman, Stanhope, & Kingsley, 1999). Temporal pole damage seems to cause graded personal semantic amnesia; M.S.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, remote autobiographical memory was substantially impaired in three other patients, who had damage to one or more cortical areas including the lateral temporal and frontal lobes (Bayley et al, 2005b). Others have also emphasized the importance of lateral temporal and frontal lobe pathology for understanding impaired remote autobiographical memory (Eslinger, 1998;Kapur, 1999;Kopelman et al, 1999;Bright et al, 2006). There is a need for thorough, quantitative anatomical information for all the patients being studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%