2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieving oocytes from small non-stimulated follicles in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): in vitro maturation (IVM) is not indicated in the new GnRH antagonist era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further worries have been reported on low pregnancy and live birth rates, as compared to conventional assisted reproduction techniques [ 16 , 25 ]. There are reports to suggest that IVM should be kept aside and performed only in certain cases when no other option is available, such as in sub-fertile cancer patients, as there are other / newer options for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [ 26 ]. In a recent update of a Cochrane review, the comparison of IVM to conventional IVF treatment was assessed [ 27 ]; nevertheless, the potential differential efficacy of IVM in PCOS versus non-PCOS subjects has not been yet addressed, in the context of a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further worries have been reported on low pregnancy and live birth rates, as compared to conventional assisted reproduction techniques [ 16 , 25 ]. There are reports to suggest that IVM should be kept aside and performed only in certain cases when no other option is available, such as in sub-fertile cancer patients, as there are other / newer options for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [ 26 ]. In a recent update of a Cochrane review, the comparison of IVM to conventional IVF treatment was assessed [ 27 ]; nevertheless, the potential differential efficacy of IVM in PCOS versus non-PCOS subjects has not been yet addressed, in the context of a meta-analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IVM has lost its value over time because the clinical outcomes, number of matured oocytes, and developmental competence of embryos are not as good as those obtained from stimulated cycles. Recent advances in ovarian stimulation procedures, safer protocols aimed at decreasing the risk of OHSS, have decreased the attention on IVM ( 16 , 17 ) . However, accumulating data from articles supporting IVM because it is safe, cost-effective, simple, repeatable, flexible, and patient friendly in nature, without the risk of OHSS, it serves as a good treatment option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those recent reports are encouraging, as in Europe the pregnancy and delivery rates in this group of patients undergoing ICSI was 35.5% and 24.3%, respectively [37]. de Ziegler et al [38] opposed the need of IVM in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist era. However, his conclusion is based on outdated publication [28,39,40], with poor results in terms of pregnancy and delivery rates in IVM.…”
Section: Ivm In Women With Normal Ovulatory Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%