1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80069-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieval time from semantic memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
1,309
5
51

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,455 publications
(1,430 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
27
1,309
5
51
Order By: Relevance
“…Jones & Mewhort, 2007). Early theories of semantic networks share a similar logic, where word meaning is acquired via relations with other words (Collins & Quillian, 1969). Nodes are represented by concepts and relationships between them are represented by links, such that words like bird become associated with feathers and animal by links such as Has and Is-a.…”
Section: University Of Warwickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones & Mewhort, 2007). Early theories of semantic networks share a similar logic, where word meaning is acquired via relations with other words (Collins & Quillian, 1969). Nodes are represented by concepts and relationships between them are represented by links, such that words like bird become associated with feathers and animal by links such as Has and Is-a.…”
Section: University Of Warwickmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hierarchical network theory (Collins & Quillian, 1969), distinctive features are stored at the lowest concept node in the hierarchy to which the feature applies. Thus, 〈moos〉 would be stored at the cow node, whereas 〈eats〉 would be stored at a higher level, such as the animal node.…”
Section: Alternative Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first models of semantic memory were hierarchical network theory (Collins & Quillian, 1969) and spreading activation theory (Collins & Loftus, 1975). Although both have been extremely influential and have provided predictions for numerous behavioral studies, both have lost favor owing to a number of well-understood and documented flaws (see Rogers & McClelland, 2004, for a recent review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, these models explain how meaning is organized in the mental lexicon and less which mechanisms are used to access meaning. Classical examples of semantic models are the hierarchical network model, 91 the semantic feature model, 92 the spreading activation model, 93 and the ACT model. 94 The question of whether phonological representations of words are tantamount to semantic representations is also a matter of debate in the field of spoken-word recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%