1980
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.6.6.732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieval of information from subjectively organized lists.

Abstract: In two experiments, subjects learned subspan and supraspan lists by sorting list items into subsets. An item recognition task followed, and reaction time was found to be a bilinear function of memory list length. The slope for supraspan lists was more shallow than the slope for subspan lists. The reaction time data for supraspan lists was replotted as a function of the number of subsets formed during the sorting task. Reaction time increased linearly with the number of subsets but was independent of the number… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The null effect of number of chunks for both correct rejections and hits is inconsistent with Franklin et al (1980). If subjects were scanning the chunks as units, RT should have increased with number of chunks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The null effect of number of chunks for both correct rejections and hits is inconsistent with Franklin et al (1980). If subjects were scanning the chunks as units, RT should have increased with number of chunks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, chunk lag is negatively correlated with chunk size: Tests of the same chunk are more widely spaced for small than large chunks, so that the RTs for items from small chunks may be inflated. The same confounding exists in Franklin et al’s (1980) experiments. Therefore, it is still possible that RT increases with chunk size for noncategorized lists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The nonlinearity of the set-size function is one impediment. Following Franklin et al (1980) it could be argued that for subspan memory sets the subjects scanned individual items, but for supraspan memory sets the subjects 'chunked' the memory sets and scanned the chunks. However, the reaction time distribution analysis showed that both mu and tau increased as a function of set size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%