2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retribution and emotional regulation: The effects of time delay in angry economic interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a distraction condition, where participants engaged in a game of Tetris and therefore could divert their attention from the induced emotion, no significant emotion differences emerged. This finding is in line with Van Dillen et al's (2012) research which showed that participants in a disgusted mood reported harsher moral judgments when they were in a wait condition or had to ruminate about their feelings (feel condition) than participants in a distraction condition (see also Wang et al, 2011). Overall, the results of the current studies support the idea that the effect of induced emotion requires attentional resources.…”
Section: The Role Of Distraction and Situational Demandssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a distraction condition, where participants engaged in a game of Tetris and therefore could divert their attention from the induced emotion, no significant emotion differences emerged. This finding is in line with Van Dillen et al's (2012) research which showed that participants in a disgusted mood reported harsher moral judgments when they were in a wait condition or had to ruminate about their feelings (feel condition) than participants in a distraction condition (see also Wang et al, 2011). Overall, the results of the current studies support the idea that the effect of induced emotion requires attentional resources.…”
Section: The Role Of Distraction and Situational Demandssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Wang et al (2011) presented third parties with a trust game, in which a second player did not reciprocate trust by the first player. Participants engaged in more third-party punishment and reported more integral anger when they had to make their decision immediately compared to conditions in which they engaged in a delay and distraction task before making their punishment decisions.…”
Section: Incidental Emotions and Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bosman et al (2001), in contrast, measure respondents' emotions and confirm that negative emotions drive the rejection rate in ultimatum games. Similarly, Wang et al (2011) and Neo at al. (2013) find that cooling-off reduces negative emotions and decreases the punishment rate in ultimatum games.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 71%
“…(2013) find that cooling-off reduces negative emotions and decreases the punishment rate in ultimatum games. In addition, Wang et al (2011) also find that the length of the cooling-off periods influences the punishment rate.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation