[Retracted] The Performance Appraisal System of Country Well‐Facilitated Farmland Based on AHP‐Object Metatopological Model

Abstract

Performance appraisal of well-facilitated farmland projects has positive significance for promoting the development of modern agriculture in rural areas and carrying out rural revitalization. Based on the AHP-object metatopological model, a well-facilitated farmland project performance appraisal system is proposed to analyze the county performance of well-facilitated farmland construction. In this study, Fangcheng County, Henan Province, is selected as the research sample area and evaluated by applying the established index system. The results show that the overall performance grade of the well-facilitated farmland project in Fangcheng County is at an excellent level with both excellent and good rates reaching more than 90%, the output is slightly lower with excellent and good rates reaching 73%, and the benefit is the worst with excellent and good rates at 53%. These indicate that the construction effect of the well-facilitated farmland project in Fangcheng County is at a good level, but the benefits are not as satisfactory as expected. In the overall appraisal, excellent accounts for 48.1%, good accounts for 26.9%, average accounts for 16.3%, and poor accounts for 8.7%. Fangcheng County has achieved a good performance level in the construction of a well-facilitated farmland project in 2019, with almost full completion of project objectives and compliance with implementation standards. This study provides a system of county performance appraisal methods for well-facilitated farmland as well as its practical application in county-level units.

Analyzing Performance Appraisal System Through Personal Biases: An Empirical Assessment

“…In addition, the research found that employee bias has a significant and negative impact on performance appraisal method. The findings of current research are in line with the previous researches (Haralayya, 2022;Meng & Zhang, 2022;Outila & Fey, 2022;Rana et al, 2022;Rubin et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2022). The primary intention behind writing this paper was to study connections that might be made between personal bias and performance rating systems.…”

“…Raters describe enduring severe discomfort when doing so. Personal prejudice may originate from a variety of factors, including information learned from colleagues, philosophical and religious convictions, as well as community and family history (Wang et al, 2022). So, it is vital to develop an assessment technique that is inclusive and centered upon the culture, operational structures, and priorities (Buckingham & Goodall, 2015).…”

“…The literature review reveals that the performance assessment technique is one of the most essential instruments for evaluating how effectively the people do their duties, but it has shortcomings that make it less effective and efficient. Employee behavior and attitude are major contributors to the basic character of change, which leads in perceptions that impact workers' reactions to change (Wang, Wang & Jia, 2022). The issue comes when the assessment's parameters are set.…”

The Impact of Government Support and Social Networks on Peasants’ Effective Participation in High-Standard Farmland Construction: Evidence from Yancheng City, China

“…The research on HSFC has mainly focused on the suitability of HSFC [13][14][15], the benefit evaluation of HSFC [7,[16][17][18], the peasants' participation of HSFC [3,[19][20][21][22][23], the realistic challenges of HSFC [24,25], and the development path of the HSFC [5,6,[25][26][27].…”

Retracted: The Performance Appraisal System of Country Well-Facilitated Farmland Based on AHP-Object Metatopological Model

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”