2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal Vasculitis and Intraocular Inflammation after Intravitreal Injection of Brolucizumab

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
269
3
23

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
12
269
3
23
Order By: Relevance
“…BARV is an inflammatory AE that is specific to brolucizumab [57]. Given that brolucizumab only received FDA approval in October 2019, it is unsurprising that this newly recognized entity remains poorly understood.…”
Section: Brolucizumab-associated Retinal Vasculitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BARV is an inflammatory AE that is specific to brolucizumab [57]. Given that brolucizumab only received FDA approval in October 2019, it is unsurprising that this newly recognized entity remains poorly understood.…”
Section: Brolucizumab-associated Retinal Vasculitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the initial results with brolucizumab have been promising, the drug's safety is currently under review due to reports of clinically significant intraocular inflammation and occlusive retinal vasculitis associated with the study drug in the HAWK and HARRIER studies as well as in patients with neovascular AMD treated with brolucizumab after the drug was approved by the FDA [26][27][28][29][30]. In addition, Novartis, the manufacturer of brolucizumab, has also reported the occurrence of vitritis and retinal vasculitis in subjects with DME being treated with RTH 258 in current studies [31,32].…”
Section: Brolucizumabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Retinal vasculitis (mostly occlusive) has also been reported in patients treated with the anti-VEGF brolucizumab. 23 There were no new cases of retinal vasculitis in the abicipar treatment groups during the second year of the CEDAR/SEQUOIA study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%