PsycEXTRA Dataset 1996
DOI: 10.1037/e526132012-089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal contributions to photic blink EMG and how to remove them

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectrum may be expected to shift to lower frequencies when the ERG is recorded from the orbicularis oculi muscle due to an increased distance to the potential source~cf., Lindström & Magnusson, 1977;Lindström & Petersén, 1983!. The ERG also contains a faster, oscillatory potential with a frequency distribution ranging from 100 to 200 Hz but this potential precedes the photic R50 component~Bos, Boelhouwer, Van den Berg-Lenssen, & Brunia, 1996;Gur & Zeevi, 1980! and thus will not be problematic under the current photic stimulation conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum may be expected to shift to lower frequencies when the ERG is recorded from the orbicularis oculi muscle due to an increased distance to the potential source~cf., Lindström & Magnusson, 1977;Lindström & Petersén, 1983!. The ERG also contains a faster, oscillatory potential with a frequency distribution ranging from 100 to 200 Hz but this potential precedes the photic R50 component~Bos, Boelhouwer, Van den Berg-Lenssen, & Brunia, 1996;Gur & Zeevi, 1980! and thus will not be problematic under the current photic stimulation conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum may be expected to shift to lower frequencies when the ERG is recorded from the orbicularis oculi muscle due to an increased distance to the potential source~cf., Lindström & Magnusson, 1977;Lindström & Petersén, 1983!. The ERG also contains a faster, oscillatory potential with a frequency distribution ranging from 100 to 200 Hz but this potential precedes the photic R50 component~Bos, Boelhouwer, Van den Berg-Lenssen, & Brunia, 1996;Gur & Zeevi, 1980! and thus will not be problematic under the current photic stimulation conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…high-pass filtering of the EMG signal, or~c! a combination of both Bos et al, 1996;Hackley & Johnson, 1996!. The most rigorous approach, combining 100-Hz high-pass filtering and occlusion of the eye~Hackley & Johnson, 1996!, may be expected to be effective but will also produce a great loss of EMG signal power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%