2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal changes in Parkinson's disease and glaucoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite that early evidence on retinal thinning in iPD, several subsequent studies have provided conflicting results. Whereas some authors have reported that iPD patients have a significant and marked thinning of the macula and its inner retinal layers, others have evidenced outer retinal layer thinning, or even thickening, and some have failed to find any differences . The variability in scanning protocols, acquisition parameters and built‐in segmentation algorithms across different OCT systems is a well‐established limitation for comparing the results of different studies and could account for the discrepancies found in the literature regarding retinal alterations in iPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite that early evidence on retinal thinning in iPD, several subsequent studies have provided conflicting results. Whereas some authors have reported that iPD patients have a significant and marked thinning of the macula and its inner retinal layers, others have evidenced outer retinal layer thinning, or even thickening, and some have failed to find any differences . The variability in scanning protocols, acquisition parameters and built‐in segmentation algorithms across different OCT systems is a well‐established limitation for comparing the results of different studies and could account for the discrepancies found in the literature regarding retinal alterations in iPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas some authors have reported that iPD patients have a significant and marked thinning of the macula 10,12-14 and its inner retinal layers, 8,9,11,[21][22][23][24][25][26] others have evidenced outer retinal layer thinning, 27 or even thickening, 11,24 and some have failed to find any differences. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The variability in scanning protocols, acquisition parameters and built-in segmentation algorithms across different OCT systems is a well-established limitation for comparing the results of different studies 35 and could account for the discrepancies found in the literature regarding retinal alterations in iPD. Specifically, the differences in acquisition speed and axial resolution between time-domain and spectral-domain OCTs might explain why studies using older time-domain OCT devices (eg, Stratus) only detected significant differences between iPD patients and controls when absolute differences in thickness were greater than 10 μm, 20,36 whereas studies using spectraldomain OCTs have yielded significant results with differences from 2 to 7 μm in thickness regardless of the area analyzed, 7,9,12,24,25,27,34,[37][38][39][40] which is consistent with the magnitude of inner retinal thinning observed in our E46K-SNCA cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual field defects can be caused by a broad variety of diseases (e.g., opticopathy, retinal disease, glaucoma). Two small studies suggested an increased risk of glaucoma in PD patients (16-24% compared to 7% in healthy controls) [9,58,59]. Central visual field defects can be screened using the Amsler grid [60].…”
Section: Optic Nerve/retinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the consensus regarding peripapillary RNFL thinning in Parkinson's disease (PD) is solid, the analysis of macular atrophy in PD has yielded conflicting results. As we pointed out in our study, this might be attributed, in part, to the variability in image acquisition methods of previous studies and to the lack of specificity of the analyzed macular parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%