2018
DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking the European Social Market Economy: Introduction to the Special Issue

Abstract: This contribution offers an introduction to the Special Issue ‘Rethinking the European Social Market Economy’. It places the Special Issue against the background of the debate on free markets versus social protection in the European Union and the inclusion of the notion of ‘social market economy’ in the Treaty on European Union. It sketches the meaning and development of the social market economy concept, and introduces the key questions underlying this Special Issue and the contributions included in it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second is achieving Europe 2020 goals and using public procurement to achieve wider social aims including the protection of working conditions (Handler, 2015). We recognize that the exercise of SRPP in the EU occurs amidst these two potentially competing goals which play out through contestation across different actors and discourses, for example social democratic political parties in support of a ‘European Social Market Economy’ versus the more widespread support for a neoliberal ‘single market’ (Claassen et al ., 2019). Our discussion however is not to decipher which of these political economic contexts is more dominant and thereby their implications for pursuing SRPP.…”
Section: Srpp As a Labour Governance Instrument In Gpnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is achieving Europe 2020 goals and using public procurement to achieve wider social aims including the protection of working conditions (Handler, 2015). We recognize that the exercise of SRPP in the EU occurs amidst these two potentially competing goals which play out through contestation across different actors and discourses, for example social democratic political parties in support of a ‘European Social Market Economy’ versus the more widespread support for a neoliberal ‘single market’ (Claassen et al ., 2019). Our discussion however is not to decipher which of these political economic contexts is more dominant and thereby their implications for pursuing SRPP.…”
Section: Srpp As a Labour Governance Instrument In Gpnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite a large number of studies (Baute et al, 2018;Claassen et al, 2019;Rosetti, 2019;Burroni et al, 2020;Ferrera, 2020) have pointed out that the transformations of the European classical model, and the history of the European economy, demonstrate its capability to take on and adapt to significant structural changes, and to ensure comparable levels of productivity and sustainable economic growth, even when the economic paradigm suffered deep changes. In practice, the European economic and business model proved to be of utmost resilience: it was able to offer its consumers durable products and to provide finance for the welfare of their citizens, when affected by the transition to other, better, economic models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up: most critical analyses of EU integration hold that the internal market is founded on the mismatch between the uniform application of economic rules over a highly uneven socio‐economic space characterized by diversity of labour law regimes (Claassen et al ., 2019). Although we are broadly sympathetic to this perspective, we believe that it relies on a binary understanding of the relationship between EU internal market law and national labour law.…”
Section: ‘Asymmetrical Market Integration’: An Incomplete Conceptual Framework?mentioning
confidence: 99%