2018
DOI: 10.1080/02188791.2018.1476320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking teaching and learning of science inference competencies of lower track students in Singapore: a Rasch investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For young students, it mainly refers to the relationships and resources that are related to science and will affect scientific attitudes and career choices, including family economic conditions, social networks, and off-campus scientific practice activities. Scientific capital is also considered as an important predictor of the development of students' ST. For example, Teo et al (2018) classified scientific capital into social capital, cultural capital, and psychological schema, and used Rasch analysis and ordinary least squares regression analysis to explore the types of scientific capital that predict students' scientific reasoning ability. The results showed that among the forms of scientific capital studied, students' self-view in science learning and view on the nature of science are significant predictors of the change of new students' scientific reasoning ability.…”
Section: Influential Factors Of Scientific Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For young students, it mainly refers to the relationships and resources that are related to science and will affect scientific attitudes and career choices, including family economic conditions, social networks, and off-campus scientific practice activities. Scientific capital is also considered as an important predictor of the development of students' ST. For example, Teo et al (2018) classified scientific capital into social capital, cultural capital, and psychological schema, and used Rasch analysis and ordinary least squares regression analysis to explore the types of scientific capital that predict students' scientific reasoning ability. The results showed that among the forms of scientific capital studied, students' self-view in science learning and view on the nature of science are significant predictors of the change of new students' scientific reasoning ability.…”
Section: Influential Factors Of Scientific Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em outro trabalho, Jones et al (2021) relataram que a motivação dos estudantes por ciência está relacionada a fatores do capital da ciência como experiência, participação e ferramentas relacionadas à ciência. Teo et al (2018) encontraram que a autoimagem do aprendizado de ciências e as concepções de natureza da ciência foram as formas mais importantes para o capital da ciência para alunos regulares, enquanto, para aqueles de um currículo técnico, a imagem do professor de ciências foi mais impactante. Adams-Wiggins, Myers e Dancis (2020) relataram que o capital da ciência representou uma forma de imposição de legitimidade e de hierarquização de estudantes ou grupos durante as dinâmicas de ensino por investigação.…”
Section: Os Usos Do Capital Da Ciência Para Além De Seus Desenvolvedoresunclassified
“…Most of the critical research on education in Singapore has been produced from the vantage point of institutional and historical analysis, and thus there remains a dearth of research on the lived encounters and perceptions of students within the educational system. Student-focused studies do exist, but these are primarily quantitative (e.g., Liu et al, 2005;Teo et al, 2018) and thus often overlap with the field of administrative educational research (e.g., Luo et al, 2011;Ning, 2017). Regardless, a small number of qualitative studies that focus on students has been conducted in the past decade, and it is worth examining them further.…”
Section: Educational Research Gaps In Singaporementioning
confidence: 99%