2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking retrosplenial cortex: Perspectives and predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 297 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is of direct relevance for spatial navigation studies performed during fMRI (i.e.,(Doeller et al, 2010; Kunz et al, 2015; Stangl et al, 2018; Bierbrauer et al, 2020)) where supine BO is unavoidable. Apart from altering navigation behavior, the supine BO may also affect place/grid-cells-related brain activity (i.e., GCLR signals in entorhinal cortex; (Doeller et al, 2010; Jacobs et al, 2013; Nadasdy et al, 2017; Maidenbaum et al, 2018; Moon et al, 2022)) or the activation of other regions involved in spatial navigation such as retrosplenial cortex(Vann et al, 2009; Mitchell et al, 2018; Bierbrauer et al, 2020; Alexander et al, 2023). The influence of physical BO on the experienced BO suggest that a virtual agent (even when it is invisible in Nobody condition) and the participant’s body are functionally linked to each other during virtual navigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is of direct relevance for spatial navigation studies performed during fMRI (i.e.,(Doeller et al, 2010; Kunz et al, 2015; Stangl et al, 2018; Bierbrauer et al, 2020)) where supine BO is unavoidable. Apart from altering navigation behavior, the supine BO may also affect place/grid-cells-related brain activity (i.e., GCLR signals in entorhinal cortex; (Doeller et al, 2010; Jacobs et al, 2013; Nadasdy et al, 2017; Maidenbaum et al, 2018; Moon et al, 2022)) or the activation of other regions involved in spatial navigation such as retrosplenial cortex(Vann et al, 2009; Mitchell et al, 2018; Bierbrauer et al, 2020; Alexander et al, 2023). The influence of physical BO on the experienced BO suggest that a virtual agent (even when it is invisible in Nobody condition) and the participant’s body are functionally linked to each other during virtual navigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological function of RSC is mainly focused on spatial navigation, associative learning, and memory formation, and neurons in the RSC can be activated in complex cognitive processes 19,20,51,52 .…”
Section: Functional Implication Of Rsc-acc Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retrosplenial cortex (RSC), plays important roles in a range of cognitive functions, including spatial navigation, episodic memory, and imagination 19 . It is proposed that RSC neurons may encode long-term memory of sensory, motor, and spatial mapping information 20 . Previous imaging studies suggest that the RSC may also be affected in chronic pain conditions 21,22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The ACC plays an important role in affective evaluation, memory, and attention; [20][21][22] the MCC is mainly involved in motor control and executive function 23 ; the PCC appears to be more involved in selfreflection and autobiographical memories; 24 and the RSC is mainly involved in sensory, motor, and spatial cognition. 25 Previous studies 26,27 have identified the cingulate gyrus and hippocampus are the most vulnerable regions at the pre-MCI stage (subjective cognitive impairment), and some scholars 28 have suggested that structural and functional abnormalities in these two regions may be the neural basis for the cognitive symptoms of pre-MCI stage. Multiple studies 29,30 have identified hippocampal white matter disruptions and gray matter volume atrophy in T2DM patients without MCI, as well as reduced FC with multiple regions in whole brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%