2023
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and functional connectivity alteration patterns of the cingulate gyrus in Type 2 diabetes

Dongsheng Zhang,
Yang Huang,
Shasha Liu
et al.

Abstract: ObjectiveWe aimed to reveal the role of structural and functional alterations of cingulate gyrus in early cognitive impairment in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.MethodsFifty‐six T2DM patients and 60 healthy controls (HCs) underwent a neuropsychological assessment and sagittal three‐dimensional T1‐weighted and resting‐state functional MRI. Differences in the cortical thickness of the cingulate cortex and the functional connectivity (FC) of the nine subregions of the cingulate gyrus and the whole brain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, of the few discordant studies (10 out of 55) reporting no significant difference in cortical thickness between T2D and control groups, Wisse et al ( 2014 ) further describe no association either between HbA1c and global brain volume; Moran et al ( 2019 ), only the possibility of an indirect contribution with cognitive decline via its association with lower cortical thickness at baseline; in Liu et al ( 2019 ), only region-based functional connectivity impairment in T2D patients compared with the control group; and in Zhang et al ( 2023 ), T2D patients did not show cingulate gyrus thickness differences but displayed altered connectivity patterns, suggesting that functional issues may precede structural changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, of the few discordant studies (10 out of 55) reporting no significant difference in cortical thickness between T2D and control groups, Wisse et al ( 2014 ) further describe no association either between HbA1c and global brain volume; Moran et al ( 2019 ), only the possibility of an indirect contribution with cognitive decline via its association with lower cortical thickness at baseline; in Liu et al ( 2019 ), only region-based functional connectivity impairment in T2D patients compared with the control group; and in Zhang et al ( 2023 ), T2D patients did not show cingulate gyrus thickness differences but displayed altered connectivity patterns, suggesting that functional issues may precede structural changes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal of each reviewed study was to assess the regional effects of T2D, whether in the presence or absence of other conditions, on cerebral cortical thickness as measured on T1-weighted MRI. Some studies dug deeper by, for example, evaluating the association between cognitive function and brain morphology in T2D patients, including the effect of various confounders such as age, years of education, and disease duration (Peng et al, 2014 ; Reynolds et al, 2023 ); investigating the relationship between fasting and non-fasting physiology with gray matter and white matter volume (Markus et al, 2017 ; Honea et al, 2022 ); measuring the association between neuropsychological deficits with structural and functional brain alternations (Garcia-Casares et al, 2014 ; Zhang et al, 2022 , 2023 ); or comparing the effect of metabolic and vascular factors on cortical and subcortical gray matter structural alterations (Korf et al, 2006 ; Brundel et al, 2010 ; Tchistiakova et al, 2014 ; Bernardes et al, 2018 ; Cui et al, 2023 ; Moreno et al, 2023 ; Reynolds et al, 2023 ). Other studies compared the impact of T2D on brain morphology not only against controls, but also prediabetes (Jing et al, 2023 ; Monereo-Sánchez et al, 2023 ), major depression (Ajilore et al, 2010 ) or mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (Moran et al, 2019 ; Palix et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations