2000
DOI: 10.1080/095373200107210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking Political Process in Technological Change: Socio-technical Configurations and Frames

Abstract: The political process perspective has done much to enhance our understanding of the organizational eÚ ects of technological change as a negotiated outcome re ecting the political and power dynamics of the adopting context. In so doing, we suggest, technology has been marginalized as an analytical category and the problem of change agency, although better understood, remains largely unresolved. This article addresses these issues through the articulation of the concepts of socio-technical con gurations and tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
57
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Political process theory, which conceptualises organisational change as the outcome of conflict between competing groups, interests or value systems (Dawson, 2003), differs from more technical theories of change in that power relations are a central focus for analysis (Buchanan & Badham, 1999;Dawson, Clausen & Nielsen, 2000;McLoughlin, Badham & Couchman, 2000).…”
Section: Cda and Political Process Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political process theory, which conceptualises organisational change as the outcome of conflict between competing groups, interests or value systems (Dawson, 2003), differs from more technical theories of change in that power relations are a central focus for analysis (Buchanan & Badham, 1999;Dawson, Clausen & Nielsen, 2000;McLoughlin, Badham & Couchman, 2000).…”
Section: Cda and Political Process Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between existing systems (be it political, economic, social or technological) and new technologies must change in order to respond to local needs (Dolata, 2009) and align with vernacular common goals such as environmental sustainability. In fact, users of the new system inevitably try to "make sense" of it based on their experiences with and knowledge of the system being replaced, or those coexisting with the new one and serving a similar purpose (McLoughlin et al, 2000). Even with a technocentric approach to urban sustainability, the analysis of cities and their interaction with technology is fruitless if people, space and time are left out (Rutherford, 2011).…”
Section: Governance: a Central Concept For Successful Technology Adapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TFR framework outlined by Orlikowski and Gash (1994) addressed these questions at a high level, noting only that individuals' frames develop and change through experience, education, and sometimes through planned interventions. The small body of TFR research we reviewed provided some additional insights, for example, how individuals' frames arise from cultural assumptions (Barrett 1999), are communicated or diffused though stories and metaphors (Davidson 2002), and change through social translation (Lin and Cornford 2000) and political processes (McLoughlin et al 2000).…”
Section: Is There a Better Way To Identify And Analyze Tfrs?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we wanted to focus on Orlikowski and Gash's TFR framework, we did not include these studies. The McLoughlin et al (2000) study incorporated sufficient aspects of both SCOT/TFR that we included it here identified different numbers of domains, and described domain content in contextually bound terms. However, a close examination of the frame domains described in these research reports suggests some similarities across settings.…”
Section: Developments In Tfr Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation