The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking dichotomization: A critical perspective on the use of “hard” and “soft” in project management research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "hard" components are the contractual based components while the "soft" components are relationship based. However, Karrbom Gustavsson and Hallin (2014) problematize the dichotomization of project management theories into "hard" and "soft". It indicates that components are opposite to each other.…”
Section: "The One Who For Its Own Account Performs or Assigns Others mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The "hard" components are the contractual based components while the "soft" components are relationship based. However, Karrbom Gustavsson and Hallin (2014) problematize the dichotomization of project management theories into "hard" and "soft". It indicates that components are opposite to each other.…”
Section: "The One Who For Its Own Account Performs or Assigns Others mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But projects are not binary and it is hard to say that certain actions are more important than others. The complexity of projects risk getting lost by this over simplification of project management (Karrbom Gustavsson and Hallin, 2014).…”
Section: "The One Who For Its Own Account Performs or Assigns Others mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent researches have pointed to the significant and relevant impact of those "soft skills" on project success (Carvalho & Rabechini, 2014). The use of the terms "hard" and "soft" represents opposite ends of a continuum rather than a true dichotomization or opposition itself (Gustavsson & Hallin, 2014). Indeed, significant and positive relations between hard and soft skills in project risk management have been uncovered (Carvalho & Rabechini, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the "hard" and "soft" dichotomization in Project Management as well as their negative implications for the development of field research has been pointed out as relevant research gaps (Gustavsson & Hallin, 2014). Concerning the abovementioned differences in management styles, behavioral aspects are not exclusive to a specific method since they are inherent to individuals who are members of a project team regardless which management style is employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation