1968
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1968.26.3c.1306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retest Reliability of Rod-and-Frame Scores during Early Adulthood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sum of the absolute number of degrees deviation from true vertical for the eight trials was used as the score. Odd-even reliabilities of .89 or greater on the RFT have been reported (Gardner, Jackson, & Messick, 1960;Witkin et al, 19S4) as well as test-retest reliabilities of .84 or greater for time intervals extending through 3 years (Adevai & McGough, 1968;Bauman, 1951). A smaller RFT score is considered indicative of greater psychological differentiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The sum of the absolute number of degrees deviation from true vertical for the eight trials was used as the score. Odd-even reliabilities of .89 or greater on the RFT have been reported (Gardner, Jackson, & Messick, 1960;Witkin et al, 19S4) as well as test-retest reliabilities of .84 or greater for time intervals extending through 3 years (Adevai & McGough, 1968;Bauman, 1951). A smaller RFT score is considered indicative of greater psychological differentiation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, Witkin et al (1967) reported test-retest reliability of .62-.92 for 10-14-year olds tested with a 3-14-year latency. Adevai and McGough (1968) used AD to score the RFT and found test-retest reliability of .86 when used with a sample of college men. Comparable reliability (.84) was found for AD with a 9-month latency when scored with college women (Applebaum, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%