2008
DOI: 10.14214/sf.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention of phosphorus in peatland buffer zones at six forested catchments in southern Finland

Abstract: Our current knowledge of the P retention efficiency of peatland buffer zone areas used to reduce sediment and nutrient leaching from forestry areas is insufficient. Especially the role of P sorption by soil in buffer zones needs closer examination as there is considerable variation in the efficiency of P retention. Six sites in southern Finland were chosen for the study. The buffer zone areas varied between 0.1-4.9% of the catchment area. A total of 10 kg of solute PO 4 -P was added to the inflow of the buffer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hitherto, a large buffer area has been considered the most important factor for nutrient binding (e.g. Väänänen et al 2008). Here we assume that the distribution of vegetation and the species composition displays the effective area of the water paths flowing in the buffer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto, a large buffer area has been considered the most important factor for nutrient binding (e.g. Väänänen et al 2008). Here we assume that the distribution of vegetation and the species composition displays the effective area of the water paths flowing in the buffer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-performing (NO 3 -N retention 93.3-99.9 %) three wetland buffers in the study by Vikman et al (2010) were all >100 m long and with no visible flow channels, while the 30 m long Asusuo buffer with a continuous flow channel across the buffer area had a NO 3 -N retention capacity of <16 %. As the P retention capacity of the Asusuo buffer was also poor (Väänänen et al 2008), Hynninen et al (2010) question the rationale of constructing such small and short buffers.…”
Section: Buffer Size and Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrological loading entering the buffer area and its temporal variability are considered to be one of the key factors (Väänänen et al 2008). During high-flow episodes, the water residence time is short and the short contact time between nutrient sinks and through-flow water nutrients, as well as the formation of flow channels across the buffer, decreases the retention efficiency ( Fig.…”
Section: Nutrient and Hydrological Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If rewetting ceases the high CO2 emissions from old peat measured in drained sites (Ojanen et al 2013), significant carbon benefits are expected -but only if the decreased CO2 emissions are not counteracted by increased CH4 emissions from the blocked ditches and other new wet habitats (Cooper et al 2014, Koskinen et al 2012. Spruce swamp forests rewetted as buffer zones for runoff waters have functioned as efficient sinks for dissolved organic matter (Nieminen et al 2005b) and, after more than six years after rewetting, for phosphorus (Väänänen et al 2008) and nitrogen (Vikman et al 2010). During the first (seven) years after rewetting though, rewetting of spruce swamp forest may increase leaching of phosphorus, nitrogen and total organic carbon (Nieminen et al 2005a, Koskinen et al 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%