2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention of individual recognition in chicks and the effects of social experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Living in large, stable social groups is often considered to favor the evolution of enhanced cognitive abilities, such as recognizing group members, tracking their social status, and inferring relationships among them (see Bond, Kamil, & Balda, 2003;Croney & Newberry 2007). The establishment and maintenance of a hierarchy is widespread in social animals, including the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus: Chase, 1982;Cloutier, Beaugrand, & Lague, 1996) and this requires the recognition of individual conspecifics (Porter, Arnould, Simac, & Hild, 2006;Vallortigara, 1992a). The animal can make inferences about its own status on the basis of observed interactions of other individuals and this suggests, implicitly, that animals may be able to use a form of logical reasoning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Living in large, stable social groups is often considered to favor the evolution of enhanced cognitive abilities, such as recognizing group members, tracking their social status, and inferring relationships among them (see Bond, Kamil, & Balda, 2003;Croney & Newberry 2007). The establishment and maintenance of a hierarchy is widespread in social animals, including the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus: Chase, 1982;Cloutier, Beaugrand, & Lague, 1996) and this requires the recognition of individual conspecifics (Porter, Arnould, Simac, & Hild, 2006;Vallortigara, 1992a). The animal can make inferences about its own status on the basis of observed interactions of other individuals and this suggests, implicitly, that animals may be able to use a form of logical reasoning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hierarchy is maintained by continued interactions, usually displays of dominance, between the females. The ability to recognise other individual conspecifics is required for the formation and maintenance of the pecking order 6 , 7 and from this the hens can make inferences about their own status on the basis of observed interactions of other individuals. Indeed, it has been shown that chickens will avoid fighting a stranger that has been observed as being dominant over another individual known to be higher in the hierarchy 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the frequency of pecks directed at familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics appears to be the most sensitive measure of social discrimination in young birds (cf. Porter et al 2006). It is proposed that pecking intensity may be a form of social exploration (Riedstra & Groothuis 2002) or aggression ( Vallortigara 1992b).…”
Section: Lateralization Of Preference For Face-like Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%