1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf02560235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retained surgical sponge after laparotomy

Abstract: Erosion of a retained surgical sponge into the intestine is an unusual occurrence and may make its appearance months or years later. The demonstration of a distended bowel by the barium-impregnated mass with multiple polypoidal filling defects in a patient who has undergone previous laparotomy should lead the physician to suspect a retained surgical sponge. Surgical intervention is rewarding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Alternatively, retained sponges may lead to serious sequelae, including sepsis, intestinal obstruction, fistulization, and death. [3][4][5][6][7][8] The…”
Section: Nadvertently Leaving Spongesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Alternatively, retained sponges may lead to serious sequelae, including sepsis, intestinal obstruction, fistulization, and death. [3][4][5][6][7][8] The…”
Section: Nadvertently Leaving Spongesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presentation may be acute (within months) or chronic (within years). Acute generally follows a septic course with granuloma or abscess formation, whereas chronic presents in the form of adhesion or encapsulation [11,12]. There is a case report of a 66-year-old man in whom gossypiboma was found after 24 years of gastrectomy [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All preventive measures should be taken to avoid this condition [14,15] . A thorough exploration of all quadrants of the abdomen at the termination of surgical cases is mandatory [1,16] . Inspite of all the effort usually done by the nurses in counting the sponge and instrument, the cases of foreign body is still seeing which could be due to failure in the counting by the attending nurses and the responsibility of nursing in missing the foreign body is debatable some consider it the responsibility of surgeon, but in my opinion, is it the surgeon responsibility to clarify that the sponge and instrument count are complete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%