Retail Store Location Selection Problem with Multiple Analytical Hierarchy Process of Decision Making an Application in Turkey

Erbıyık, Hikmet; Özcan, Selami; Karaboğa, Kazım

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1125

Cited by 65 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The usage of qualitative and quantitative method together will then help structure problems into systematic hierarchy, and the usage of quantitative through questionnaire survey will become the check and balance that determine validity of characteristics based on the opinions of respondents (Safian et al, 2014) Based on the research done by Tobergte & Curtis, (2013), three key principles of AHP can be categorised as comparative judgments, synthesis of interest and decomposition. The AHP also provides versatile ability in showing how decision theories are made and to solve particular problems (Erbıyık, Özcan, & Karaboğa, 2012). Therefore, for this research, the researcher has adopted AHP as the quantitative methodology in achieving the second objective.…”

Section: Quantitative Methods Questionnaire Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The major limitation expected to be encountered by the researcher is that finding the suitable respondents for the questionnaire, and the willingness of respondents to answer the questionnaire survey. Previous studies conducted by Safian & Nawawi, (2013), Dinarvandi et al, (2014), Agarwal, Patil, & Mehar, (2013), and Erbıyık et al, (2012) showed that owners, tenants, and occupants are prospective respondents for the questionnaire survey incorporating AHP. Similar researches conducted by Ho et al, (2005), Pekkonen, Du, Skon, Raatikainen, & Haverinen-Shaughnessy, (2015), Mulliner, Smallbone, & Maliene, (2013) and Khoiry et al, (2012) have also shown that the occupants and owners of houses can become the best respondents due to their knowledge and experience living, in particular, residential areas.…”

Section: Quantitative Methods Questionnaire Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Characteristic Qualities Impacting Landed House Prices: Better homes, better livelihood

Masri¹,

Nawawi²,

Safian³

et al. 2017

E-BPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research was conducted to find the characteristics quality of houses in Malaysia. The aim of this research was to produce the ranking characteristics of house qualities, and determining its weightages. The methodology used in this research was primarily by using the Delphi Method to ascertain characteristics quality and also Analytical Hierarchy Process to determine the ranking of the characteristics quality. Data collection gathered through a structured questionnaire that incorporates the element of Saaty's Scale using variables outlined from review and interview. A theoretical framework of the research was established from this that will lead to future research model.

show abstract

Section: Quantitative Methods Questionnaire Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Quantitative Methods Questionnaire Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Characteristic Qualities Impacting Landed House Prices: Better homes, better livelihood

Masri¹,

Nawawi²,

Safian³

et al. 2017

E-BPJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, considering the rapid increase in the number of retail stores and shopping malls, with nearly identical product and service offerings, slight differences in location can have a substantial effect on sales performance and profitability. Finally, the disadvantages or problems of an initially wrong decision in retail store location are extremely difficult to overcome as the location decision represents a long-term, fixed investment which is immobile and unique [37][38][39].Given the importance of the issue, retail location decision has become the subject matter of different disciplines such as marketing, urban sciences, economics, geography, applied mathematics and geomarketing and different retail location theories, models and procedures have been proposed. In this sense, it is possible to say that retail location theory is comprised of four broad theoretical areas that are central place theory, spatial interaction theory, land value theory and the principle of minimum differentiation [38,[40][41][42][43][44][45].Central place theory provides a powerful explanation of the spatial structure of retail facilities and considers the behavior of consumers and retail firms in a spatial market.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for the Location Selection of Shopping Malls: A Case Study from Turkey

Erdin

Akbaş

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques are increasingly being used for the problem of location selection, which directly affects the long-term success of a company. Besides these techniques, with the advantage of handling both spatial and non-spatial data, geographic information systems (GIS) also represent a useful method for selecting the appropriate location for different kinds of facilities and sites. In this respect, this study aims to compare the results of a MCDM technique, fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and GIS for the location selection of shopping malls in Turkey. According to the results of both fuzzy TOPSIS and GIS, the Marmara region was determined as the best alternative for shopping malls in Turkey.Sustainability 2019, 11, 3837 2 of 22 sense, it can be easily said that location selection represents a typical multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem [3][4][5][9][10][11].As an advanced and a widely used subdiscipline of operations research, MCDM basically represents a decision-making technique that can be used to evaluate a number of alternatives by taking into account multiple and usually conflicting criteria that may be quantitative or qualitative, and aims to provide support to the decision maker for making the choice between alternatives [9,[12][13][14]. In this framework, MCDM can be defined as the process of evaluating alternatives for the purpose of selection or ranking via utilizing a number of qualitative and/or quantitative criteria that have different measurement units [15].MCDM involves a set of techniques such as min-max, max-min, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, TOPSIS, fuzzy TOPSIS, compromise programming, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy AHP, data envelopment analysis, and goal programming, that can be used for comparing and prioritizing multiple alternatives and finally selecting the best-fit choice [16]. Among these techniques, for the solutions to location problems that contain vague and incomplete data and linguistic variables, fuzzy decision-making techniques have been attracting growing attention [12,17].On the other hand, it should be stated that these techniques are not suitable for spatial data [18]. In this context, with the advantage of handling both spatial and non-spatial data, geographic information systems (GIS) have been applied for solving location problems [18][19][20]. GIS represent computer-based tools that can be used for maintaining, managing, integrating and analyzing spatial data from different sources. GIS allow us to store, edit, manipulate and analyze geographically referenced data to generate interpretive maps and related statistics relevant for decision making [11,14,21]. In this sense, one could say that although MCDM and GIS have developed independently, they actually support one another and their combination generates more useful and reliable information that makes it possible to reach accurate decisions, especially in the case of location selection [11,14,22].Starting from this point of view, thi...

show abstract

“…Saaty tarafından geliştirilen AHP birçok uygulamada kullanılmaktadır. Özellikle taşınmaz geliştirme projelerinde yer seçimi için tercih edilen yöntemlerdendir [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Aynı zamanda değer tahminine yardımcı olabilecek bir yaklaşımdır.…”

Section: çOk öLçütlü Karar Analiziunclassified

Eşdeğerli̇li̇k Esasli Arazi̇ Ve Arsa Düzenlemesi̇nde Anali̇ti̇k Hi̇yerarşi̇ Prosesi̇ni̇n Kullanimi

Yalpır¹,

Ekiz²

2017

Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZÜlkemizde arazi ve arsa düzenlemesi çalışmalarında alansal bazda eşitlik sağlanarak uygulamalar yapılmaktadır. Uygulamaların bu şekilde yapılması pek çok problemlere neden olmakta ve vatandaşlara adaletsiz dağıtımdan kaynaklı haksızlıklar yaşatılmaktadır. Özellikle imar uygulamalarındaki alan esaslı çalışmaların düzenlenerek değer esaslı çalışmalara dönüştürülmesi bu tür problemleri ortadan kaldıracaktır. İyi bir değerleme işlemi, taşınmaz değerine etki eden genel ve özel faktörlerin değerleme işlemine katılması ile mümkündür. Taşınmazın değerini etkileyen bu faktörlerin her parsele aynı oranda etkilemeyeceği aşikârdır. Dolayısıyla her bir etmen için, ağırlık katsayılarının belirlenmesi zorunluluğu ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada imar uygulanmasında taşınmazın önceki ve sonraki değerleri elde edilmek istenmiştir. Değeri etkileyen faktörler uygulama öncesi ve sonrasındaki duruma göre ayrı ayrı ele alınmış ve Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) yöntemine göre ağırlıkları belirlenmiştir. Bu ağırlıklardan faydalanarak konumsal faktörler, mesafelere göre puanlandırılarak hem kadastro parsellerinin hem de imar parsellerinin faktör değerleri elde edilmiştir. Bu faktör değerlerinin öncesi ve sonrası durum toplamları eşitlenmiştir. Taşınmazlar AHP değerli dağıtıma uygun hale getirilmiştir. Çalışmanın başarısını belirlemek için sonuçlar yürürlükteki uygulama ile karşılaştırılmıştır.Anahtar Kelimeler: Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi, imar, eşdeğerlilik esaslı arazi ve arsa düzenlemesi, değer USE OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS IN EQUIVALENCE BASED ARRANGING LANDS AND PLOTS ABSTRACTIn our country, plot and land management studies are being made by providing equality on the areal basis. The application in this manner causes many problems and the citizens are subjected to injustice due to field based distribution. Particularly, zoning practice will abolish such problems field-based studies to be transformed in to value-based studies. A good valuation process, general and specific valuation factors that affect the value of the real estate, it is possible to take part in the process. It is obvious that these factors affecting the value of the real estate will not affect each parcel in the same way. Therefore, for each factor, the necessity of determining the weight coefficients arises. In this study, in the implementation of zoning the values previous and next of the real estate is wanted to be obtained. Factors of the value affecting were handled separately according to the situation before and after the application and their weights were determined by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Spatial factors using the specified weights were scored by distance. Factor values of both cadastral and reconstruction plots have been obtained. The pre-and post-state totals of these factor values were equalized. The real estates have been made available for AHP valued distribution. The results were compared with the current practice to determine the success of the work.

show abstract

Retail Store Location Selection Problem with Multiple Analytical Hierarchy Process of Decision Making an Application in Turkey

Cited by 65 publications

References 7 publications

Characteristic Qualities Impacting Landed House Prices: Better homes, better livelihood

Characteristic Qualities Impacting Landed House Prices: Better homes, better livelihood

A Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for the Location Selection of Shopping Malls: A Case Study from Turkey

Eşdeğerli̇li̇k Esasli Arazi̇ Ve Arsa Düzenlemesi̇nde Anali̇ti̇k Hi̇yerarşi̇ Prosesi̇ni̇n Kullanimi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About