2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resurfacing Arthroplasty Versus Silicone Arthroplasty for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
94
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Ashworth et al [11] (68 months' follow-up) and Takigawa et al [12] (78 months' follow-up) studies, the mean was 298 and 308, respectively [12]. In the Lin et al [10] (40 months' follow-up) and Branam et al [13] (45 months' follow-up) studies, it was 468 and 498, respectively, and in the Namdari et al [14] (49 months' follow-up) study it was 618.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the Ashworth et al [11] (68 months' follow-up) and Takigawa et al [12] (78 months' follow-up) studies, the mean was 298 and 308, respectively [12]. In the Lin et al [10] (40 months' follow-up) and Branam et al [13] (45 months' follow-up) studies, it was 468 and 498, respectively, and in the Namdari et al [14] (49 months' follow-up) study it was 618.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, a report that compared pyrocarbon and silicone implants found no significant advantage between revision rates or ROM between the two designs (Branam et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Constrained prostheses loosen at a higher rate than non-constrained prostheses. The latest trend at the PIP joint specifically has been towards two component surface replacement away from the original monoblock silicone prostheses [1,13]. By replacing only Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%