2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of open reduction and plate osteosynthesis in comminuted fracture of the olecranon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
28
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the results of bone grafting reported by CerveraIrimia and colleagues 23 in patients with comminuted fractures, we considered doing the same in 3 patients with significant comminution but opted against bone grafting as the degree of comminution in our patients was not sufficient to warrant this procedure. Erturer and colleagues 17 used the conventional plate for the treatment of olecranon fractures classified as Mayo IIB and IIIB fractures. They obtained an average flexion and extension of 116° (our result was 138°), and an average pronation and supination of 126° (our result was 170.3°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the results of bone grafting reported by CerveraIrimia and colleagues 23 in patients with comminuted fractures, we considered doing the same in 3 patients with significant comminution but opted against bone grafting as the degree of comminution in our patients was not sufficient to warrant this procedure. Erturer and colleagues 17 used the conventional plate for the treatment of olecranon fractures classified as Mayo IIB and IIIB fractures. They obtained an average flexion and extension of 116° (our result was 138°), and an average pronation and supination of 126° (our result was 170.3°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the function of the extremity by measuring the range of flexion, extension, pronation and supination of the forearm, and we compared these values with those for the uninjured extremity of the same patient and with the reference values in literature to assess the success of the operative method and of the implant applied. [16][17][18] Approximately 6 months after the surgery, the patients were interviewed about their general impression and their possible difficulties (hardships present or not); in the presence of hardships we tried to assess them quantitatively (mild, moderate, intense). For this investigation we used the Mayo elbow performance score questionnaire, which takes into consideration objective (range of motion, stability of the joint) as well as subjective (existence and intensity of pain, daily functions of the joint) parameters for the appraisal of joint function.…”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The standard treatment for displaced olecranon fractures is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), with typical methods including tension band wiring or plating. [1][2][3][4] The chosen method of surgical intervention depends on many factors, including the amount of bone loss, the amount of comminution, the stability of the joint and the ability to reduce the articular surface. 3 Displaced noncomminuted olecranon fractures were traditionally treated using tension band wiring, which was first described by Weber and Vasey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] The chosen method of surgical intervention depends on many factors, including the amount of bone loss, the amount of comminution, the stability of the joint and the ability to reduce the articular surface. 3 Displaced noncomminuted olecranon fractures were traditionally treated using tension band wiring, which was first described by Weber and Vasey. 5 This method was designed with the theory that early mobilization would create tensile forces across the fracture that would be converted to compression forces and prevent nonunion, while minimizing the loss of range of motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 The standard treatment for displaced olecranon fractures is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), with typical methods including tension band wiring or plating. 6,7 The chosen method of surgical intervention depends on many factors, including the amount of bone loss, the amount of comminution, the stability of the joint and the ability to reduce the articular surface. Displaced noncomminuted olecranon fractures were traditionally treated using tension band wiring, which was first described by Weber and Vasey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%