2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1024856009030063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of joint observations of aerosol perturbations of the stratosphere at the CIS-LiNet network in 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify the source of aerosol formations, recorded in the atmosphere over Tomsk and Surgut, back trajectories of air masses were constructed. The technique for constructing direct and back trajectories of air masses is widely used for identification of sources of anomalous atmospheric formations (e.g., [2,16]). The trajectories presented show that aerosol cloud formations recorded in the atmosphere over Tomsk and Surgut were brought from the region of primary localization of ejecta of Eyjafjallajökull volcano and reached the lidar observation sites in corresponding periods of time.…”
Section: Lidar Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the source of aerosol formations, recorded in the atmosphere over Tomsk and Surgut, back trajectories of air masses were constructed. The technique for constructing direct and back trajectories of air masses is widely used for identification of sources of anomalous atmospheric formations (e.g., [2,16]). The trajectories presented show that aerosol cloud formations recorded in the atmosphere over Tomsk and Surgut were brought from the region of primary localization of ejecta of Eyjafjallajökull volcano and reached the lidar observation sites in corresponding periods of time.…”
Section: Lidar Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After eruptions of Okmok and Kasatochi volcanoes, the aerosol disturbance of the stratosphere was observed at the observation sites in Minsk (53.9 • N; 27.4 • E), Tomsk, and Vladivostok (43.0 • N; 131.9 • E) at lidar network CIS-LiNet for monitoring aerosol and ozone in CIS regions until late 2008. The results of these measurements, as well as the results of expedition measurements, performed by Institute of Atmospheric Optics in Gobi Desert, were considered in detail in [13], together with the air mass trajectory analysis.…”
Section: Changes In the Stratospheric Aerosol Content During 2006-2011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2010 average relative discrepancy between the ground based and satellite data, retrieved with the OMI-DOAS algorithm, is 3.8 DU (1.1% of the annual average). As an illustration, Figure 1b and Sarychev Peak) had relatively low intensity (almost two orders of magnitude less intense than Pinatubo volcano, by the mass of sulfur dioxide injected to the stratosphere) and was accompanied by short term (within a few months) increases in SA con tent [17,19]. Simultaneously, minor short term TO changes were observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%