The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of concomitant groin-free percutaneous temporary RVAD support using a centrifugal pump with a double-lumen jugular venous cannula in LVAD patients

Abstract: Background: Modern left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have evolved to become standard of care in severe heart failure (HF) patients. Right HF (RHF) is a major complication responsible for early mortality. Several techniques for temporary right ventricular assist device (t-RVAD) have been described before, baring relevant disadvantages such as limited mobilization or the need for re-thoracotomy. We describe the results of an alternative technique for t-RVAD using the Tandem Heart™ with ProtekDuo™ cannula. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, major post‐operative complications as defined by INTERMACS, 26 and duration of inotropic support were without a significant difference between the MC and no‐MC groups. Remarkably, there was a trend towards higher incidence of post‐operative RV failure as defined by EUROMACS ( European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support ) 27,28 in the MC group ( P = 0.077), along with a more frequent need for RV support 28,29 and a significantly higher duration of nitric oxygen (NO) ventilation in the MC group ( Table 4 ), pointing to a higher peri‐operative tension on the RV in the MC group compared with the no‐MC group. Functional as well as laboratory and echocardiography parameters did not display differences between the MC and no‐MC groups at one year after LVAD implantation ( Table 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, major post‐operative complications as defined by INTERMACS, 26 and duration of inotropic support were without a significant difference between the MC and no‐MC groups. Remarkably, there was a trend towards higher incidence of post‐operative RV failure as defined by EUROMACS ( European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support ) 27,28 in the MC group ( P = 0.077), along with a more frequent need for RV support 28,29 and a significantly higher duration of nitric oxygen (NO) ventilation in the MC group ( Table 4 ), pointing to a higher peri‐operative tension on the RV in the MC group compared with the no‐MC group. Functional as well as laboratory and echocardiography parameters did not display differences between the MC and no‐MC groups at one year after LVAD implantation ( Table 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the patient's status, the results of a TAH procedure were regarded as unfavourable in the patient as surgical trauma would have been unequally larger than LVAD surgery. Within our heart failure heart team, we assessed this patient to be a good candidate for durable LVAD support with temporary groin‐free RVAD, 3 assuming the acute COVID‐19 infection to be one major and reversible issue impairing the RV. However, the high haemocompatibility of the HeartMate 3 device remains outstanding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time, NT-proBNP was 163 837 pg/mL, C-reactive protein raised to 24.5 mg/dL, IL-6 to 124 pg/mL, and PCT to 7.73 ng/mL ( Table S1). The patient was referred to heart surgery with LVAD as therapeutic bridge-to-transplant option, percutaneous temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation, 3 and tricuspid repair on Hospital Day 13. Hereafter, weaning from the RVAD was successful 2 weeks after implantation.…”
Section: Case Report Clinical Manifestation and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the first postoperative day (POD), the patient was weaned from the respirator and full mobilization continued. The temporary RVAD was weaned according to our protocols 10 and explanted at the bedside on POD 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%