2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of an international comparison for the determination of radionuclide activity in bilberry material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were collected in the summer of 2005 in a region close to the Chernobyl reactor site, but outside the exclusion area. The sample collection and preparation procedures were described elsewhere by Wätjen et al [31].…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were collected in the summer of 2005 in a region close to the Chernobyl reactor site, but outside the exclusion area. The sample collection and preparation procedures were described elsewhere by Wätjen et al [31].…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material was sterilized by gamma-irradiation to enhance its longterm stability and to facilitate its transport across borders. [3] In a matrix material, source heterogeneity may influence the results obtained from different (sub-)samples, also in a supplementary comparison. Therefore, the (in)homogeneity of the three radionuclides was determined for the comparison material: 0.9 % ( 137 Cs), 2.1 % ( 40 K), and 1.8 % ( 90 Sr) for an aliquot mass of 50 g [5].…”
Section: Materials Used In Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the data on the measurement of gamma-ray emitters in this comparison have been published earlier [3]. Where necessary, they are reproduced here in order to present a comprehensive report of the whole comparison CCRI(II)-S8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative water content of the six samples, determined by using small sample aliquots (each with a mass of about 0.5 g) was between 3.8% and 4.3%. The results of all the participants are under evaluation by the organizers; the preliminary results will be discussed and presented in a paper accepted at the ICRM2011 International Conference, in September 2011 [6]. The measurements done at LDPM regarded the determination of 90Sr content in the mixture.…”
Section: The Jrc-irmm Ccri(ii)-s8 Supplementary Comparison On 40k 1mentioning
confidence: 99%