1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(05)80043-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a policy with arm veins used as the first alternative to an unavailable ipsilateral greater saphenous vein for infrainguinal bypass

Abstract: Arm veins are an easily accessible autologous conduit of sufficient length to reach the midtibial level. Excellent patency rates allow durable limb salvage in otherwise difficult circumstances. Vein configuration and splicing do not affect patency rates, but vein quality and repeat operations do. Angioscopy is a valuable adjunct to upgrade graft quality. The contralateral saphenous should be saved for subsequent contralateral revascularization or coronary artery bypass grafting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
2
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
75
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous reports, 29 including the experience reported from our institution. 30 The reasons for this difference are multiple and probably not related to any flaw in the intrinsic biology of arm veins. 31 The arm veins have often received previous venipunctures or cannulations, with resultant injury and scarring.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with previous reports, 29 including the experience reported from our institution. 30 The reasons for this difference are multiple and probably not related to any flaw in the intrinsic biology of arm veins. 31 The arm veins have often received previous venipunctures or cannulations, with resultant injury and scarring.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that there is no difference in outcome between reversed and nonreversed long saphenous vein grafts 37 and that comparable patency can be obtained with arm vein. 38 Because arm vein grafts are often used in difficult repeat surgery, there may be a mistaken impression of poorer outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5]10 Neointimal formation after bypass grafting or angioplasty involves a complex interaction between multiple growth factors that promote VSMC proliferation and migration. [10][11][12][13][14] Therefore, it appears unlikely that selective inhibition of a particular growth factor will completely prevent lesion formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 While the neointimal hyperplasia that occurs in all vein grafts helps to achieve mechanical stability in these otherwise thin-walled conduits, it is believed that this neointima serves as the substrate for the development of atherosclerotic disease. Up to 50% of vein bypass grafts fail within a period of 10 years as a result of this occlusive disease, [3][4][5] whereas high patency rates are maintained for periods exceeding 15 years when arterial vessels without significant neointima are used as bypass grafts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%