Restructuring, Race, and Real Estate: Changing Home Values and the New California Metropolis, 1989-2010

Abstract

The wake of the foreclosure crisis warrants renewed attention to geographies of race and real estate. This case study of the San Francisco Bay Area shows that outlying exurban communities on the metropolitan fringe, which saw major in-migrations of communities of color over the past three decades, were hard hit by the real estate crash, after having seen substantial housing price increases during the tail end of the boom. The potential impact on wealth and asset accumulation for these communities is significant. Rather than traditional forms of segregation, this new geography of crisis suggests a form of peripheralization, where minority communities in particular were lured out to the far suburbs under structural conditions of neoliberalism, far different from the federally supported suburbanization of two generations ago. This new reality is reminiscent of the urban roots of the foreclosure crisis, and of the need to view the crisis at a metropolitan scale.[

Race, Space, and Cumulative Disadvantage: A Case Study of the Subprime Lending Collapse

“…Although prices rose higher among whites they dropped by only 35% compared with 40% among blacks. Thus the explosion and collapse of home values in Baltimore further cemented the nexus between geography, race, and real estate value, thereby putting black wealth even further behind that of whites (Conley 1999; Oliver and Shapiro 1995; Schafran and Wegmann 2012). …”

Water marginalization at the urban fringe: environmental justice and urban political ecology across the North–South divide

“…Two broad types of peripheralization are visible in the United States: fringe areas incorporated within metropolitan census boundaries (e.g., Schafran & Wegmann, 2012) and economically disadvantaged rural and peri-urban unincorporated 4 areas (e.g., Anderson, 2008;Jepson, 2014;Mukhija & Mason, 2013;Ward, 1999). We focus on the latter in this article.…”

Why (Not a Right to) Housing?

“…And so there are more complex-and often seemingly contradictoryspatialities. There is a lot more complexity in the legal and institutional connections between class power and class struggle mediated through Wall Street and Washington, on the one hand, and all sorts of other landscapes of extraction and leverage-the declining inner cities and slow-growth suburbs across deindustrialized Rustbelt cities, as well as the sprawling Sunbelt suburbs for the upwardly mobile and the upwardly hopeful (Ashton, 2011;Schafran & Wegmann, 2012). The "peripheralization" of the "structural conditions Housing Policy Debate 31 of neoliberalism" as it has advanced in recent years is in contrast to the "federally supported suburbanization of two generations ago" (Schafran & Wegmann, 2012, p. 630).…”