2013
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restrictive allograft syndrome post lung transplantation is characterized by pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
166
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(35 reference statements)
16
166
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This additional scar tissue was mainly situated in the upper lobes (as seen in figure 1d). The reason is unknown, however in idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, which seems to be similar to RAS and where mainly apical fibrosis is also seen, venous and arterial fibrosis was seen in the majority of patients [5,18]. This might indicate hypoperfusion and ischaemia of these areas, although the mechanism of this is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This additional scar tissue was mainly situated in the upper lobes (as seen in figure 1d). The reason is unknown, however in idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, which seems to be similar to RAS and where mainly apical fibrosis is also seen, venous and arterial fibrosis was seen in the majority of patients [5,18]. This might indicate hypoperfusion and ischaemia of these areas, although the mechanism of this is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, RAS is defined by the presence of a mixed restrictive and obstructive pattern of lung physiology, histopathological evidence of pleuroparenchymal fibro-elastosis as well as radiological evidence of interstitial fibrosis. Roughly speaking, approximately 70% of post-transplant patients affected by CLAD have BOS and 30% have the RAS clinical phenotype of CLAD [2,3,5,6]. Compared with the much better known BOS clinical phenotype, patients with RAS experience a worse prognosis (3.5 versus 1.5 years); the reasons for this difference in prognosis are poorly understood [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In fact, areas of diffuse alveolar damage in patients with restrictive allograft syndrome after lung transplantation with ensuing PPFE appear to support this hypothesis. 15 Nonetheless, whatever the pathogenesis may be, it remains clear that once PPFE pattern is identified, 3,5 the disease is often rapidly progressive, with frequent complication of pneumothorax and poor prognosis. No effective therapy is available at this juncture, 5 and hence the importance of diagnosing this entity in conjunction with clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the term CLAD as not all patients immediately develop the typical restrictive pulmonary function defect and we aimed to describe the radiological changes starting from the moment that the FEV 1 consistently remained under 20% of the best post-operative values. Pathology reports were available when patients underwent re-transplantation, open lung biopsy or autopsy and the typical findings were previously described by Ofek et al and include extensive alveolar fibrosis, septal thickening but also obliterative bronchiolitis (7).…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%