1988
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.4.625-629.1988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restriction endonuclease analysis of DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis biovars

Abstract: DNA from a total of 60 Chlamydia trachomatis isolates was examined by restriction endonuclease analysis. Strains from all established biovars and serovars were tested. There was great diversity between the mouse biovar and the lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) and trachoma biovars. The LGV and trachoma biovar isolates generated similar fragment patterns; however, distinct fragments appeared to be unique to both biovars, thus allowing differentiation of these two major groups. In most cases, strains of the same se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 2 are the neutralization data from the high-titer patient no. 4 convalescent-phase sera against various serotypes and strains of LGV L2 UCI-20 6 9 ± 17 9 ± 9 0 ± 12 L2 ATCC-434 4 a Both the isolate and serum were collected on the same day from the patient. All assays were performed twice on different days, with the exception of those for strain MI-2225.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 2 are the neutralization data from the high-titer patient no. 4 convalescent-phase sera against various serotypes and strains of LGV L2 UCI-20 6 9 ± 17 9 ± 9 0 ± 12 L2 ATCC-434 4 a Both the isolate and serum were collected on the same day from the patient. All assays were performed twice on different days, with the exception of those for strain MI-2225.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In animal models they are more lethal and in cell cultures they are easier to propagate than the trachoma biovar strains, probably due to their invasive properties (2,8). These two biovars also differ in their DNA structure as shown by restriction endonuclease analysis (3,4) and their outer membrane proteins with regard to charge (60 and 12 kilodaltons) and molecular mass (12 kilodaltons) (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. trachomatis serovars Li (440), L2 (434), L3 (404), A (G-17), B (TW-5), Ba (Apache-2), C (TW-3), D (IC-Cal-8), E (Bour), F (UW-6), G (UW-57), H (UW-4), I (UW-12), J (UW-36), and K (UW-31); Chlamydia psittaci (Texas turkey); and TWAR-183 were grown in HeLa 229 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.) as previously described (17)(18)(19)22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. trachomatis L3 EBs were purified as described by Caldwell et al (3). The DNA was extracted from purified EBs by using the method of Peterson and de la Maza (17,18), and a library was constructed in Agtll (27). The L3 DNA was sonicated for 10 s (Braun Sonic, 2,000; B. Braun Instruments, Burlingame, Calif.), blunt ended with Escherichia coli polymerase I (New England BioLabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation