2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-019-09667-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, future studies should evaluate the reproducibility of the scale. Second, although in the process of adapting the scale, the functioning of the items was analyzed using a Rasch model, in the entire sample, the differential functioning of the items was not evaluated, so it is recommended to examine item performance with more robust models based on the item response theory (Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, future studies should evaluate the reproducibility of the scale. Second, although in the process of adapting the scale, the functioning of the items was analyzed using a Rasch model, in the entire sample, the differential functioning of the items was not evaluated, so it is recommended to examine item performance with more robust models based on the item response theory (Liu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the calibration sample for true ξ ^ 1 and true ξ ^ 2 is different from the evaluation sample. Liu et al (2019) described this conditional estimation problem as restricted recalibration (RR) and demonstrated that under the setup of RR, normalbold ω ^ ω is asymptotically equivalent to…”
Section: Residual Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With no subset partition, the residual becomes the standard statistic in evaluating model fit in the RR problem (Liu et al, 2019). The asymptotic residual variance for item i can be written as…”
Section: Residual Methods With No Partition Of S1 and S2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential functioning of the items and the construct validity were not evaluated through models based on the item response theory that provide additional elements for the refinement of the scales [23]. However, having shorter versions of measurement instruments can offer some advantages in research and the clinical setting: blunt instruments are usually one-dimensional and show more reproducible psychometric indicators in different contexts [24].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%