1964
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.2903.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted Motility of the Speech Articulators in Cerebral Palsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
24
1
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspection of the intcrcorrelation matrix (table III) demon strates the high interrelatedness these three speech rates (0.81. 0.70, and 0.84) have with each other, which is similar to that reported by Hixon and Hardy [ 1964] for the cerebral palsied children they studied. Whether such relationship would hold for an expanded grouping of CV syllables including conso nants less homogeneous in terms of feature components could be questionable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Inspection of the intcrcorrelation matrix (table III) demon strates the high interrelatedness these three speech rates (0.81. 0.70, and 0.84) have with each other, which is similar to that reported by Hixon and Hardy [ 1964] for the cerebral palsied children they studied. Whether such relationship would hold for an expanded grouping of CV syllables including conso nants less homogeneous in terms of feature components could be questionable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This finding differs from that reported by Hixon and Hardy [1964], who found that, for cerebral palsied children, speech alternate motion rates were, in all cases, the better predictors of judged severi ty of dysarthria. A comparison with the study of Heilman and Peacher [1943] could not be made since correlations between various individual alternate motion rates used in that study and dysarthria were not reported.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The task, which is often referred to by the terms syllable alternating motion rate (AMR), rapid repetitive articulation (RRA), or oral diadochokinesis (DDK), is included in standard assessment protocols for speech disorders (Robin, Solomon, Moon, & Folkins, 1997;Enderby, 1983;Hartelius, Svensson, & Bubach, 1993). The examination is considered speechlike since it is based on real syllables (Hixon & Hardy, 1964;Kent, 1997), and it is seen as a particularly sensitive index of motor speech impairments because it requires maximum performance (Kent, Kent, & Rosenbek, 1987). In normal children oral DDK rate is correlated with age and is viewed as an index of oral motor development (Henry, 1990;Williams & Stackhouse, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%