2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted dynamic observer error linearizability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Krener and Isidori [25] and Bestel and Zeits [26] pioneered dynamic error linearization. Since then, as a topic of significant interest to a large number of researchers, multiple strategies for further developing it to various classes have been offered [27][28][29]. One of the most compelling arguments in favor of linearization is that it ensures the observer's stability during fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krener and Isidori [25] and Bestel and Zeits [26] pioneered dynamic error linearization. Since then, as a topic of significant interest to a large number of researchers, multiple strategies for further developing it to various classes have been offered [27][28][29]. One of the most compelling arguments in favor of linearization is that it ensures the observer's stability during fault detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is beginning with a group of necessary and sufficient conditions for observer canonical form (OCF) of single output system proposed by Krener and Isidori (1983). Then many scholars popularized this theory (See in Krener and Respondek (1985), Xia and Gao (1989) and Hou and Pugh (1999) for the multi-outputs system, in Lee (2017) for verifiable conditions, in Lee et al (2015) for restricted dynamic observer error linearizability and the reference herein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%