2011
DOI: 10.7748/en2011.11.19.7.14.c8810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restraint in the care of children

Abstract: As a nursing student on an emergency department (ED) placement, the author of this article experienced personal and professional conflict while restraining a child during a clinical procedure. This experience should be familiar to ED nurses, many of whom, however, lack confidence in the use of restraint techniques. This article describes how nurses can acquire this confidence while understanding the practical and legal implications of restraint. The article emphasises the importance of involving children and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preschool children’s views and opinions of the procedures can be difficult to obtain, but their expressions of resistance can indicate that the situations with restraint are not neutral to them (Svendsen et al, 2015). The naming of actions is relevant because it may signal the level of force needed to accomplish a procedure (Darby & Cardwell, 2011; Graham & Hardy, 2004; Hart et al, 2008) and may also reflect the healthcare providers’ moral evaluation of coercive practices as unproblematic, as a necessary evil, as something we should prevent and mitigate to a further extent, or as deeply problematic. Regardless of the amount of force used, the child and parents may experience the situation as more intrusive and distressing than the term “holding” indicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preschool children’s views and opinions of the procedures can be difficult to obtain, but their expressions of resistance can indicate that the situations with restraint are not neutral to them (Svendsen et al, 2015). The naming of actions is relevant because it may signal the level of force needed to accomplish a procedure (Darby & Cardwell, 2011; Graham & Hardy, 2004; Hart et al, 2008) and may also reflect the healthcare providers’ moral evaluation of coercive practices as unproblematic, as a necessary evil, as something we should prevent and mitigate to a further extent, or as deeply problematic. Regardless of the amount of force used, the child and parents may experience the situation as more intrusive and distressing than the term “holding” indicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is challenging when children do not want to have the procedure performed and there is justifiable clinical need. Nursing students and qualified staff have reported distress, anxiety, guilt and professional conflict when involved in restraining a child for clinical procedures (Valler-Jones and Shinnick 2005, Lloyd et al 2008, Darby and Cardwell 2011.…”
Section: Effects On Children Parents and Nursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same study shows that children feel less worried, calmer and respected when they are provided with information and asked about the care [12]. According to [13] this also leads to an increased feeling of control which in turn leads to improved compliance and more effective care.…”
Section: Communication and Communication Problems In Health Care Situmentioning
confidence: 88%