1982
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(82)90090-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of pasture after topsoil removal: Effects on soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization, microbial biomass and enzyme activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sparling et al (2003) found that microbial C (likely related to C min in our study) was a more responsive indicator in monitoring topsoil recovery following landslips (shallow landslides) in New Zealand. Faster recovery of microbial C compared with total C also occurred at mine restoration sites (Ross et al 1982;Insam and Domsch 1988). In our study, the degree of recovery (a component of soil resilience) depended on the fraction in question.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Sparling et al (2003) found that microbial C (likely related to C min in our study) was a more responsive indicator in monitoring topsoil recovery following landslips (shallow landslides) in New Zealand. Faster recovery of microbial C compared with total C also occurred at mine restoration sites (Ross et al 1982;Insam and Domsch 1988). In our study, the degree of recovery (a component of soil resilience) depended on the fraction in question.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The differences between RoW MBC levels were mostly not significant. Ross et al (1982) showed that sowing topsoil-stripped soil to pasture, and heavy fertilisation restored MBC more or less to its initial level after 4 yr even as SOC increased only slowly. Dick (1997) suggested that soil enzyme activity measurements can provide unique biological information about soil health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All biochemical reactions are catalysed by soil enzymes, and nutrient cycling in soil involves biochemical, among other, processes. Ross et al (1982) used soil enzyme activities, along with other biochemical properties to assess the effectiveness of soil reclamation because there is growing evidence that soil biological properties are sensitive to environmental stresses (Dick 1997). They reported that activities of soil enzymes such as phosphatase and urease increased with time after seeding topsoil-stripped soil to pasture, but after 3 yr had not attained the level measured on the undisturbed soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resultados semelhantes foram encontrados por Stroo & Jencks (1985) em área sob mineração de carvão, verificando relação entre o teor do CO e de Nt com a atividade da fosfatase ácida. Em áreas sob mineração de manganês nos EUA e na Europa, a fosfatase ácida foi altamente afetada pela mineração, apresentando em torno de 28 % da atividade de uma área adjacente, não minerada, no entanto, quando estas áreas foram revegetadas com gramíneas e leguminosas, apresentaram aumento da atividade desta enzima promovida pela vegetação (Stroo & Jencks, 1982;Ross et al, 1982;Kiss et al, 1993), como confirmado pelos resultados aqui encontrados. Neste estudo, a atividade da fosfatase ácida não discriminou as áreas reabilitadas tanto da serra como do campo, demonstrando que, apesar de participação importante no ciclo do P, a revegetação da área promoveu o rápido retorno de sua atividade.…”
Section: Atividade Microbiana E Enzimática Do Solounclassified