1997
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199701000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of Function in the Paralyzed Rabbit Orbicularis Oculi Muscle by Direct Functional Electrical Stimulation

Abstract: Restoration of the ability to blink and protect the eye in the patient with facial paralysis remains a challenge. Although many treatments exist, no one approach corrects all the deficits associated with the loss of orbicularis oculi function. In this study, the author investigated the feasibility of restoring function by direct electrical stimulation of the paralyzed orbicularis oculi muscle in the rabbit model. Using a pacing device developed by the author, functional restoration of a normal-appearing blink … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No signs of pain (flinching, blinking, or vocalizing) were observed in our experiments. A prior study observed that rabbits initially flinched in response to orbicularis oculi stimulation, but signs of pain diminished over time (Otto, 1997). There is evidence that FES paradigms including interferential stimulation (McDonnall et al, 2009) and low-intensity multichannel stimulation (Somia et al, 2001) render facial muscle stimulation functional but not painful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No signs of pain (flinching, blinking, or vocalizing) were observed in our experiments. A prior study observed that rabbits initially flinched in response to orbicularis oculi stimulation, but signs of pain diminished over time (Otto, 1997). There is evidence that FES paradigms including interferential stimulation (McDonnall et al, 2009) and low-intensity multichannel stimulation (Somia et al, 2001) render facial muscle stimulation functional but not painful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly for FES, denervation also causes a transient increase in excitability, due in part to increased sensitivity to acetylcholine, followed after a few days by decreased excitability due to Wallerian degeneration of the axons distal to the injury (Sunderland, 1978). Nevertheless, prior animal studies of facial FES have elicited functional movement (e.g., complete eyelid closure) for several months after paralysis (Salerno et al, 1991; Otto, 1997; Sachs et al, 2007). This may be explained in part by demonstrations that FES can prevent and even reverse the effects of denervation, both in facial muscles (Salerno et al, 1991) and non-facial muscles (Eberstein and Eberstein, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, functional electrical stimulation has not been applied in rodents, despite some reports have evaluated its efficacy for neurofunctional restoration after facial nerve lesions in rabbits [97][98][99]. We can not exclude the possibility of retrograde signals may have triggered the increases of FGF-2 in the neuronal cells of facial nucleus after the functional electrical stimulation performed in our works, however it seems possible that proprioceptive reflexes might have exerted an important role in that process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…A biocompatible polymer parylene film, made with a plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition system, was used to cover the electrode and platinum wire (0.02 mm in diameter), acting as a flexible insulator. 7 Photolithography and oxygen deep reactive ion-etching techniques were applied to the exposed electrode.…”
Section: Electrode Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%