2005
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting EEG effects during exposure to a pulsed ELF magnetic field

Abstract: Continuing evidence suggests that extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF MFs) can affect animal and human behavior. We have previously demonstrated that after a 15 min exposure to a pulsed ELF MF, with most power at frequencies between 0 and 500 Hz, human brain electrical activity is affected as measured by electroencephalography (EEG), specifically within the alpha frequency (8-13 Hz). Here, we report that a pulsed ELF MF affects the human EEG during the exposure period. Twenty subjects (10 males; 10 fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
66
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(56 reference statements)
11
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some changes in the somatosensory areas were observed over time, but there was no significant interaction with magnetic field exposure. These fMRI effects were seen after a 15-min exposure, consistent with effects seen in humans on EEG from similar length exposures (Cook et al 2005) and anti-nociception seen in snails and rodents also after 15-min exposures (Thomas et al 1997). However, in previous human studies investigating subjective relief from both acute and chronic pain, longer periods of exposure were used (Shupak et al 2004;Thomas et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some changes in the somatosensory areas were observed over time, but there was no significant interaction with magnetic field exposure. These fMRI effects were seen after a 15-min exposure, consistent with effects seen in humans on EEG from similar length exposures (Cook et al 2005) and anti-nociception seen in snails and rodents also after 15-min exposures (Thomas et al 1997). However, in previous human studies investigating subjective relief from both acute and chronic pain, longer periods of exposure were used (Shupak et al 2004;Thomas et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, in humans, the effect is specific to nociception and does not affect thermal sensory thresholds (Shupak et al 2004), and is effective on both acute and chronic pain (Thomas et al 2007). The analgesic effect appears to operate via the central nervous system, as suggested by the effectiveness of localized head-only exposures, and reports of pulsed magnetic field exposures affecting electroencephalographic (EEG) measurements (Cook et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some relevant studies to which our results can be compared are those of Cook et al [19]- [20] which employed exposures that bear some spectral resemblance to those employed here (pulsed ELF exposures but with homogeneous exposure properties), and they reported both increases and decreases of alpha activity during and shortly after exposure. In addition Stevens reported a decrease of alpha activity after exposure to weak magnetic fields [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Cook et al, 2006;C. M. Cook, Thomas, Keenliside, & Prato, 2005; C. M. Cook et al, 2004;Cvetkovic & Cosic, 2006De Ninno et al, 2008;Lyskov, Juutilainen, Jousmaki, Hänninen, et al, 1993;Lyskov, Juutilainen, Jousmaki, Partanen, et al, 1993;Marino & Becker, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified