2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsiveness, Minimal Detectable Change, and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in Patients With Improved Performance After Stroke Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes exceeding the MDC represent the amount by which a subject's measure needs to change to be sure the change is greater than measurement error. 7,33,35 Our data show that the MDC is 20% or greater of the respective mean value for each position tested. As such, individual subject changes after intervention are not likely to exceed the MDC in many cases.…”
Section: Within-day Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Changes exceeding the MDC represent the amount by which a subject's measure needs to change to be sure the change is greater than measurement error. 7,33,35 Our data show that the MDC is 20% or greater of the respective mean value for each position tested. As such, individual subject changes after intervention are not likely to exceed the MDC in many cases.…”
Section: Within-day Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…7 The MDC is an estimate of the smallest amount of change between separate measures that can be detected objectively as true change outside of the measurement error. 7,33,35 This calculation helps clinical decision making as to whether the change score in individual performance represents real change. 4,35 The MDC 90 is frequently used when the outcomes aid decisions regarding effectiveness of an intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(337)NEAS is found to be reasonably reliable and feasible in elderly patients. (267,270,339) It is validated for hip replacement patients, but not for fracture patients. We believe that the similarity between fracture and replacement patients is acceptable for using NEAS as a measure of i-ADL.…”
Section: Outcomes and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Wu et al 378 suggested that the minimum clinically significant difference in the total NEADL score is 2.4, so this has been used within the sample size calculation for a future study. Based on a t-test with an alpha value of 5% and 90% power to detect a difference of 2.4 (SD 5.86), 254 participants are required to complete the trial over both treatment groups.…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%