Responsive supervision of the psychiatric resident and clinical psychology intern

Cohen, Ronald Jay; DeBetz, Barbara

doi:10.1007/bf01252823

Cited by 30 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The dynamics in the substance abuse counseling field (i.e., recovery status and differences in training) have great potential for negatively affecting this relationship (Culbreth & Borders, 1998). It has been demonstrated that the quality of relationship variables are directly related to supervision outcome (Cohen & DeBetz, 1977;Worthington & Roehlke, 1979). This has also been shown to be true for counselors across various levels of experience.…”

Section: Autonomymentioning

confidence: 98%

Supervision of Substance Abuse Counselors Using the Integrated Developmental Model

Anderson

2001

The Clinical Supervisor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Little has been written about the supervision of substance abuse counselors. Even less has been written about the application of supervision models in substance abuse counseling. The supervision of substance abuse counselors has been described as vague, fragmented and even nonexistent. In order to provide effective supervision of substance abuse counselors, it would be helpful for the supervisor to use an existing model of supervision. This paper will apply the 3 overriding structures (self and other awareness, motivation, and autonomy) of the Integrated Developmental Model of clinical supervision to substance abuse counselors. Special attention will be placed on the unique issues of substance abuse counseling and their implications on clinical supervision.

show abstract

Section: Autonomymentioning

confidence: 98%

Supervision of Substance Abuse Counselors Using the Integrated Developmental Model

Anderson

2001

The Clinical Supervisor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is particularly important to begin focusing on the supervisory relationship in substance abuse counseling because (a) the dynamics in the substance abuse field (i.e., recovery status) include factors that have great potential for negatively affecting the relationship, as previously noted, and (b) the relationship is critical to supervision outcome. A number of researchers have indicated that the quality of the relationship variables in supervision are directly related to the positive outcome of supervision (Cohen & DeBetz, 1977;Holloway, 1995;Krause & Allen, 1988;Worthington & Roehlke, 1979;Worthington & Stern, 1985). This conclusion has been supported by studies of counselors across all levels of experience, all of whom have indicated a desire for supervision that is supportive and relationship oriented (Kennard, Stewart, & Gluck, 1987;Usher & Borders, 1993).…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Perceptions of the Supervisory Relationship: Recovering and Nonrecovering Substance Abuse Counselors

Culbreth

Borders

1999

Jour of Counseling & Develop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The unique set of dynamics found in the substance abuse field (i.e., recovering and nonrecovering counselors and supervisors) calls for a separate examination of the supervisory relationship within this context. The authors examined differences in counselors' perceptions of the supervisory relationship based on counselor and supervisor recovery status, and the match or mismatch of counselor and supervisor recovery status. Substance abuse counselors (N = 547) working in a statewide public mental health system located in the Southeast rated satisfaction with supervision and reported perceptions of various dimensions of the supervisory relationship. Results of the 2 (counselor recovery status: nonrecovering and recovering) H 2 (supervisor recovery status: nonrecovering and recovering) multivariate analysis of variance indicated no significant differences in ratings of satisfaction or relationship dimensions based on either the counselors' or supervisors' recovery status. A significant interaction effect for counselor and supervisor recovery status (i.e., match or mismatch of recovery status) was found for all satisfaction and relationship measures.

show abstract

“…According to the legal doctrine of respondeat superior ("let the master respond"), "masters" (employers, supervisors, corporate entities) can incur vicarious liability for the acts of their "servants." Cohen and Mariano (1982) elaborate:…”

Section: In O'neill V Montefore H~s P I T a L ~mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Guidelines for avoiding legal jeopardy are also presented.A record amount of malpractice litigation against physicians during the last decade has sensitized practitioners in all health-related professions to the need for an adequate understanding of the legal framework in which they function. Practitioners in the field of behavioral science, including psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, psychiatric nurses, occupational therapists and others have taken cognizance of a foreboding constellation of societal factors that may make them more vulnerable than ever before to the receipt of a summons and complaint alleging malpractice (Cohen, 1979;Cohen and Mariano, 1982;Stone, 1977;Green and Cox, 1978; Bernstein, 1978.) Thorough knowledge of a professional specialty is a necessary but no longer sufficient condition for the successful practice of that specialty; a knowledge of the law is essential.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The professional liability of behavioral scientists: An overview

Cohen

1983

Behavioral Sci & The Law

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Issues regarding the question of what constitutes malpractice by psychologists, psychiatrists, and other mental health professionals, are reviewed. The legal concepts of negligence, professional liability, and causation are explained and related subjects including the duty of mental health professionals and what constitutes a breach of that duty are discussed and illustrated. Guidelines for avoiding legal jeopardy are also presented.A record amount of malpractice litigation against physicians during the last decade has sensitized practitioners in all health-related professions to the need for an adequate understanding of the legal framework in which they function. Practitioners in the field of behavioral science, including psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, psychiatric nurses, occupational therapists and others have taken cognizance of a foreboding constellation of societal factors that may make them more vulnerable than ever before to the receipt of a summons and complaint alleging malpractice (Cohen, 1979;Cohen and Mariano, 1982;Stone, 1977; Green and Cox, 1978; Bernstein, 1978.) Thorough knowledge of a professional specialty is a necessary but no longer sufficient condition for the successful practice of that specialty; a knowledge of the law is essential. NEGLIGENCE, MALPRACTICE, AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITYStated generally, all adults have a legal duty to conduct'themselves in a fashion that at least measures up to the way that any ordinary and reasonable person would behave under the same or similar circumstances. If a person's unintentional behavior falls short of this "ordinary and reasonable person" standard, the behavior is described as "negligent." Negligence is formally

show abstract

Responsive supervision of the psychiatric resident and clinical psychology intern

Cited by 30 publications

References 71 publications

Supervision of Substance Abuse Counselors Using the Integrated Developmental Model

Supervision of Substance Abuse Counselors Using the Integrated Developmental Model

Perceptions of the Supervisory Relationship: Recovering and Nonrecovering Substance Abuse Counselors

The professional liability of behavioral scientists: An overview

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About