2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9103-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsibility in Nanotechnology Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 120 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore not surprising, given the timing of the development and commercialisation of nanotechnology, and the liberal adoption of RRI within the policy discourse, that nanotechnology is viewed by key stakeholders as the leading field of scientific endeavour for activities and discussions about RRI (Rip 2014;Grunwald 2014). This is evident in the variety of RRI approaches or 'devices of responsibility' that have been proposed in order to orient nano research and innovation more effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore not surprising, given the timing of the development and commercialisation of nanotechnology, and the liberal adoption of RRI within the policy discourse, that nanotechnology is viewed by key stakeholders as the leading field of scientific endeavour for activities and discussions about RRI (Rip 2014;Grunwald 2014). This is evident in the variety of RRI approaches or 'devices of responsibility' that have been proposed in order to orient nano research and innovation more effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%