2015
DOI: 10.1086/683682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of riparian tetragnathid spiders to wildfire in forested ecosystems of the California Mediterranean climate region, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not assess prey composition of spiders, however, to test this idea. A previous study on tetragnathid spiders from California found no difference in abundance at burned and unburned sites, with fires having burned between 2 and 15 years before the surveys (Jackson and Sullivan 2015). In northern Idaho streams, however, spider densities increased 5–6 years after severe fire, in association with increases in insect emergence (Malison and Baxter 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not assess prey composition of spiders, however, to test this idea. A previous study on tetragnathid spiders from California found no difference in abundance at burned and unburned sites, with fires having burned between 2 and 15 years before the surveys (Jackson and Sullivan 2015). In northern Idaho streams, however, spider densities increased 5–6 years after severe fire, in association with increases in insect emergence (Malison and Baxter 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Studies that have examined both imports and exports of insects to and from streams after wildfires, and linked this to characteristics of both aquatic and riparian consumer populations, are relatively rare. In many mountain streams, trout and riparian spiders (Tetragnathidae) utilize cross‐ecosystem insect subsidies (Benjamin et al 2011), making them useful indicators of changes in food web functioning that may be affected by wildfires and post‐fire disturbances (Koetsier et al 2007, Jackson and Sullivan 2015). Additionally, while many post‐fire studies on stream community ecology have evaluated mid‐term effects, fewer have quantified change on shorter time scales (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have examined the relationship between floods and food chain length, with results indicating a positive effect (Sullivan et al 2015, Jackson and, negative effect (Parker and Huryn 2006, McHugh et al 2010, Sabo et al 2010, or no effect (Thompson and Townsend 1999). Working in the same study area, Jackson and Sullivan (2018) found that higher magnitude predictable floods were associated with longer food chains leading to tetragnathid spiders.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Regulated And Unregulated Rivers And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the current literature on the interplay between aquatic ecosystems, wildfires and trophic cascades indicates context‐specific and complex processes that require more research to be understood for a management context (Jager et al, 2021; Minshall, 2003; Verkaik et al, 2015). For instance, aquatic–riparian ecosystems are influenced by the timing of climatic variables, such as precipitation, in concurrence with wildfire events (Jackson & Sullivan, 2015), or reduction of riparian shading, which promotes algal growth, producing shorter‐term flood–wildfire productivity pulse events (Malison & Baxter, 2010).…”
Section: Mechanisms Generating Positive Biodiversity Outcomes From Ri...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important to consider for ecosystem management. Much previous literature recognizes the importance of the timing and frequency of disturbance events, such as wildfires, in predicting aquatic and riparian biodiversity recovery, especially in accordance with other seasonal characteristics, such as climate (Jackson & Sullivan, 2015; Mester et al, 2015). Floodplain reconnectivity restoration projects often operate at the reach scale (e.g., most existing Stage Zero projects) and involve the restoration of pre‐Anthropocene biotic and abiotic processes (Cluer & Thorne, 2014; Table 1), all of which operate on a range of spatial and temporal scales.…”
Section: River Restoration and Wildfire Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%