2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:plso.0000035553.53865.ec
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of photosynthetic rates and yield/quality of main crops to irrigation and manure application in the black soil area of Northeast China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drought effect alleviation by N application was also reported by Liu et al (2004). The present work indicates that the maize genetic improvement for low g s and anthesis-silking interval, under N supply, could be an important approach for drought tolerance and water economy in agriculture.…”
Section: Stomatal Conductance Of Maize Under Water and Nitrogen Deficitssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Drought effect alleviation by N application was also reported by Liu et al (2004). The present work indicates that the maize genetic improvement for low g s and anthesis-silking interval, under N supply, could be an important approach for drought tolerance and water economy in agriculture.…”
Section: Stomatal Conductance Of Maize Under Water and Nitrogen Deficitssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The spatial changes in V PD , g c , and S tress suggest that high V PD corresponds with low g c and S tress , and low V PD in contrast corresponds with high g c and S tress . Such phenomena are consistent with crop growth mechanisms in which plants typically respond to high V PD by reducing stomatal conductance (g c ), which effectively retains soil moisture for periods with less evaporative demand (Sinclair et al, 1984) and meanwhile reduces S tress (Ray et al, 2002;Hetherington and Woodward, 2003;Liu et al, 2004;Ribaut et al, 2009).…”
Section: Consistent Patterns Of Variability In Climate and Soil Watersupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A higher content was achieved in (2007) established that irrigation levels had no effect on the protein content of soybean. The present results also differ from those of other studies (Liu et al 2004, Candogan et al 2013) that reported a decrease in protein content as soybean yield was maximized by irrigation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%