2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of five almond cultivars to irrigation: Photosynthesis and leaf water potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7) and that the irrigation water supplied was not sufficient to alleviate the deficit of available water in deep soil layers. However, this trend disagrees with that reported by Gomes-Laranjo et al (2006) for young almond trees, under similar irrigation system, where a positive response of < wpd and P values to irrigation was observed. Such a difference may be attributed to the fact that almond trees were young and growing in the absence of herbaceous vegetation, and therefore with a root system still dependent on the upper soil layers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…7) and that the irrigation water supplied was not sufficient to alleviate the deficit of available water in deep soil layers. However, this trend disagrees with that reported by Gomes-Laranjo et al (2006) for young almond trees, under similar irrigation system, where a positive response of < wpd and P values to irrigation was observed. Such a difference may be attributed to the fact that almond trees were young and growing in the absence of herbaceous vegetation, and therefore with a root system still dependent on the upper soil layers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The Ψ Stem and stomatal conductance records in LFDI were according to those reported by other authors such as GomesLaranjo et al, who established Ψ Stem ranges of -2.3 MPa to -2.9 MPa in non-irrigated almonds [35]. As stated by Chaves et al, stomatal aperture is governed by several weather and soil-water conditions [36].…”
Section: Plant Physiological Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This species is one of the oldest tree nut crops, and today represents the largest production of any commercial tree nut product. The response to water defi cit of almond trees is a well-documented process (Esparza et al , 2010Klein et al 2001 ;Gomes-Laranjo et al;2006, Rouhi et al 2007Egea et al 2010 ) . The results obtained on the agronomic response of almond trees to different defi cit irrigation strategies demonstrate the prevalence of direct and strong links between the intensity of the water restriction and the response of several parameters related to tree growth, yield and water status (Rouhi et al 2007 ;Egea et al 2010 ) .…”
Section: Almondmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During periods of water defi cit, species of the genus Prunus show signifi cant decrease in gas exchange (RuizSánchez et al 2000a ;Besset et al 2001 ;Klein et al 2001 ) . The decrease of soil humidity, together with high values of vapour pressure deficit (VPD), causes reduction in leaf water potential (LWP), carbon assimilation and transpiration in different species of Prunus (Rieger and Duemmel 1992 ;Rieger 1995 ;Berman and DeJong 1996 ;Alar on et al 2000 ;Besset et al 2001 ;Esparza et al 2001 ;Klein et al 2001 ;Rieger et al 2003 ;Matos et al 2004 ;Romero et al 2004c ;Gomes-Laranjo et al 2006 ;Intrigliolo and Castel 2006 ;Dichio et al 2007 ;Godini et al 2008 ;Egea et al 2010 ) . Some studies also highlighted the activation of antioxidant defenses as a strategy to face drought-dependent oxidative stress in this genus (Scebba et al 2001 ;Sofo et al 2005 ;Sorkheh et al 2011 ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%