2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) to excessive food availability: Implications for using food as a yardstick resource in motivation tests

Abstract: Food is frequently used as a 'yardstick' in operant experiments. However, previous work on silver foxes had suggested that how food is presented can affect how they respond to it, with excess food leading to variable consumption rates, and cages containing food being avoided over control cages except while eating. Our first experiment therefore examined foxes' consumption of excess food in more detail by comparing their daily intakes with foxes fed a control diet for 4 weeks. Eighteen silver fox vixens were as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A caution note should be added in relation to using food as a yardstick, beyond the aspects already discussed by Hovland et al (2007) on how food is presented. In studies involving mammals and birds, this resource is usually assumed as the most inelastic, against which motivation for access to other resources is compared (Dawkins, 1990;Kirkden and Pajor, 2006).…”
Section: Open Vs Closed Economy Training and Rewardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A caution note should be added in relation to using food as a yardstick, beyond the aspects already discussed by Hovland et al (2007) on how food is presented. In studies involving mammals and birds, this resource is usually assumed as the most inelastic, against which motivation for access to other resources is compared (Dawkins, 1990;Kirkden and Pajor, 2006).…”
Section: Open Vs Closed Economy Training and Rewardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the experiment, the intake of individual subjects was also monitored on a daily basis. If some food remained uneaten on 2 consecutive days, the ration was slightly reduced to avoid a possible loss of appetite and/or aversion to leftover food (Hovland et al, 2007). The food consisted of 50% protein, 33% fat and 17% carbohydrate with a metabolizable energy content of 115 kcal/100 g. Water was available from drinking cups in the operant cage and replenished three times a day.…”
Section: Operant Trial For Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the experiment, the intake of individual subjects was also monitored on a daily basis. If some of the food remained uneaten on 2 consecutive days, the ration was slightly reduced to avoid a possible loss of appetite (Hovland et al, 2006b). The food was a standard wet paste for fur animals consisting of 50% protein, 33% fat and 17% carbohydrate with a metabolizable energy content of 115 kcal/ 100 g. Water was available from drinking cups in the operant cage and was replenished three times a day.…”
Section: Trial 2-motivation For Access To Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%