2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of biofilm characteristics to variations in temperature and NH4+-N loading in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating micro-polluted raw water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, by using a same reactor without media under similar conditions, the standard of SDBS outlet for discharging into the surface water was not achieved for 100 and 200 mg/L of SDBS concentrations at 72 hours of HRT. It implied that the biomass attached as biofilm on the media surfaces played an important (9). However, when shifting the operation from the 72 hours HRT to 24 hours (by increasing the droplets from 1 mL/88 seconds to 1 mL/29 seconds, considering that each 15-16 droplets is equal to 1 mL) in zone D of Figure 4, degradation levels and COD removal of SDBS suddenly decreased to below 88% and 80%, respectively, for both MBBR and control reactors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, by using a same reactor without media under similar conditions, the standard of SDBS outlet for discharging into the surface water was not achieved for 100 and 200 mg/L of SDBS concentrations at 72 hours of HRT. It implied that the biomass attached as biofilm on the media surfaces played an important (9). However, when shifting the operation from the 72 hours HRT to 24 hours (by increasing the droplets from 1 mL/88 seconds to 1 mL/29 seconds, considering that each 15-16 droplets is equal to 1 mL) in zone D of Figure 4, degradation levels and COD removal of SDBS suddenly decreased to below 88% and 80%, respectively, for both MBBR and control reactors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbial growth nutrient was prepared by mixing the nutrient solution and the synthetic wastewater, keeping the COD/N/P ratio close to 100:5:1 (9). The nutrient ingredients were K 2 HPO 4 , KH 2 PO 4 , NH 4 Cl, CaCO 3 , NaHCO 3, respectively 5, 15, 120, 10, and 10 grams, for each liter of tap water (11).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With greater than a 90 % removal rate of NH 4 and 85 % of COD diss , it can be inferred that this MBBR system was successful in treating STE. Additionally, the high removal rates established in this study at 25°C occur close to the optimal AOB growth temperature of 28-29°C (Zhang et al 2013). The results are higher than those reported in the literature, for example by Sabry (2010), who employed a two-compartment system using an upflow septic tank/ baffled reactor to treat septic tank effluent in rural areas of Egypt.…”
Section: Treatment Of Septic Tank Effluent In Continuous Flow Mbbrmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…He also reported that an increase in the retention time of up to 5-7 days was needed to achieve a COD reduction time of 87 % at a lower temperature of 13°C. Zhang et al (2013) studied the use of a moving-bed reactor as a treatment for micropolluted waters; a considerable decline in the NH 4 ? -N removal efficiency was reported at lower temperatures (\4°C).…”
Section: Treatment Of Septic Tank Effluent In Continuous Flow Mbbrmentioning
confidence: 99%