Enhancement of Biological Nitrogen Fixation of Common Bean in Latin America 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2100-2_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to inoculation and N fertilization for increased yield and biological nitrogen fixation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with earlier reports that application of starter N fertilizer in different sources of phosphorus fertilizer increased cowpea grain and fodder yields and phosphorus nutrient use efficiency [6]. However, Da Silva et al [22] reported that application of N fertilizer at higher rate to Phaseolus vullgaris inhibit biological N fixation and does not also result in higher yields. Similarly, other studies have reported a decrease in NUE with increased N application to Phaseolus vulgaris in different locations of Ethiopia [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This agrees with earlier reports that application of starter N fertilizer in different sources of phosphorus fertilizer increased cowpea grain and fodder yields and phosphorus nutrient use efficiency [6]. However, Da Silva et al [22] reported that application of N fertilizer at higher rate to Phaseolus vullgaris inhibit biological N fixation and does not also result in higher yields. Similarly, other studies have reported a decrease in NUE with increased N application to Phaseolus vulgaris in different locations of Ethiopia [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The addition of N to dry bean is reported to decrease N 2 fixation and nodulation (both in nodule mass and number present per plant) (Graham, 1981;Da Silva et al, 1993;Leidi and Rodriguez-Navarro, 2000). This study supports these findings to some degree, since nodule ratings were reduced by some N treatments, especially at the higher N rates.…”
Section: Nodule Ratingssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Nitrogen fixation may be limited by several factors alone or more often in combination: low levels of micronutrients, competition with native (but usually ineffective) soil rhizobia, and high inputs of N which tend to inhibit fixation (Graham and Ranalli, 1997). Studies have shown that inoculation of dry beans with effective rhizobia helps with nitrogen fixation and increases yields (Duque et al, 1985;Da Silva et al, 1993;Camacho et al, 2001), but yields were not affected in the Upper Midwest (Weiser et al, 1985). Even when inoculated, some studies have found higher yields with the addition of N fertilizers (Edje et al, 1975;Henson and Bliss, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings also agreed with reports by Madukwe et al [23] that the application of manure increased the soil pH and other soil physico-chemical properties after treatment. Higher pH values at harvest was earlier attributed to application of phosphorus fertilizer and the positive effect of liming which neutralized soil acidity [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%