2020
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to faecal microbiota transplantation in ulcerative colitis is not sustained long term following induction therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first FMT studies on UC pointed to limited efficacy, although recent revisions (11, 23) observed higher remission when using high fecal dosage, regardless of the donor, and the previous administration of antibiotics; however, certain other variables might also be involved (24), as the duration and severity of the disease (11). None of our 4 patients showed relevant clinical improvement after FMT, which contrast with previous reports (25)(26)(27); however, the beneficial effects reported in those studies were not long lasting. Conversely, a recent study (28) provided evidence for the long-term efficacy of FMT in patients with UC, particularly associated with the increase in Proteobacteria and the decrease in Bacteroidota phyla.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The first FMT studies on UC pointed to limited efficacy, although recent revisions (11, 23) observed higher remission when using high fecal dosage, regardless of the donor, and the previous administration of antibiotics; however, certain other variables might also be involved (24), as the duration and severity of the disease (11). None of our 4 patients showed relevant clinical improvement after FMT, which contrast with previous reports (25)(26)(27); however, the beneficial effects reported in those studies were not long lasting. Conversely, a recent study (28) provided evidence for the long-term efficacy of FMT in patients with UC, particularly associated with the increase in Proteobacteria and the decrease in Bacteroidota phyla.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…19 Induction FMT does not appear to be durable for most patients with UC with subsequent disease relapse a median of 6 months post FMT. 22 There are limited data on the role of maintenance FMT in patients with UC, with only one RCT of 61 patients showing similar rates of clinical (87% vs 67%, P = 0.11), but higher rates of endoscopic and histologic remission at week 48 after colonoscopic FMT every 8 weeks compared with placebo. 23 One placebo controlled RCT to date has been performed to assess the role of FMT in maintaining remission in Crohn's disease, with only 17 patients included in the intention to treat analysis.…”
Section: Evidence For Use Of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation For Gastrointestinal Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a meta‐analysis, the safety and effectiveness of FMT for treating UC was reported 27 . Reportedly, FMT did not have a sustained effect on the treatment of UC patients unless the administration was repeated and prolonged 28 . The efficacy of FMT depends on microbial interactions between the donor and recipient strains 29 .…”
Section: Ibdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 27 Reportedly, FMT did not have a sustained effect on the treatment of UC patients unless the administration was repeated and prolonged. 28 The efficacy of FMT depends on microbial interactions between the donor and recipient strains. 29 The interactions between bacterial and metabolic pathways are also associated with the induction of remission.…”
Section: Ibdmentioning
confidence: 99%