No abstract

ObjectiveFaecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has proved to be an extremely effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, and there is interest in its potential application in other gastrointestinal and systemic diseases. However, the recent death and episode of septicaemia following FMT highlights the need for further appraisal and guidelines on donor evaluation, production standards, treatment facilities and acceptable clinical indications.DesignFor these consensus statements, a 24-member multidisciplinary working group voted online and then convened in-person, using a modified Delphi approach to formulate and refine a series of recommendations based on best evidence and expert opinion. Invitations to participate were directed to Australian experts, with an international delegate assisting the development. The following issues regarding the use of FMT in clinical practice were addressed: donor selection and screening, clinical indications, requirements of FMT centres and future directions. Evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.ResultsConsensus was reached on 27 statements to provide guidance on best practice in FMT. These include: (1) minimum standards for donor screening with recommended clinical selection criteria, blood and stool testing; (2) accepted routes of administration; (3) clinical indications; (4) minimum standards for FMT production and requirements for treatment facilities acknowledging distinction between single-site centres (eg, hospital-based) and stool banks; and (5) recommendations on future research and product development.ConclusionsThese FMT consensus statements provide comprehensive recommendations around the production and use of FMT in clinical practice with relevance to clinicians, researchers and policy makers.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can reactivate following liver transplantation. Management of patients currently considered low risk based on pretransplant serology remains contentious, with universal prophylaxis and preemptive strategies suffering from significant deficiencies. We hypothesized that a CMV-specific T cell assay performed early after transplant as part of a preemptive strategy could better stratify "low-risk" (recipient seropositive) patients. We conducted a prospective, blinded, observational study in 75 adult recipients. QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus was performed both before and at multiple times after transplant. Low-risk patients (n 5 58) were monitored as per unit protocol and treatment was commenced if CMV > 1000 copies/mL (DNAemia). Twenty patients needed antiviral treatment for other reasons and were censored (mainly for rejection or herpes simplex virus infection); 19/38 (50%) of the remaining low-risk patients developed DNAemia at mean 34.6 days after transplant. A week 2 result of <0.1 IU/mL was significantly associated with risk of subsequent DNAemia (hazard ratio [HR], 6.9; P 5 0.002). The positive predictive value of 80% suggests these patients are inappropriately labeled low risk and are actually at high likelihood of CMV reactivation. A secondary cutoff of <0.2 IU/mL was associated with moderate risk (HR, 2.8; P 5 0.01). In conclusion, a protocol based on a single early CMV-specific T cell based assay would offer improved risk stratification and individualization of patient management after transplant. This could offer improved drug and service utilization and potentially result in significant improvements over both currently used protocols to manage supposedly low-risk patients.

Oral lyophilized fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI); however, limited data exist on its efficacy in primary CDI and long-term microbial engraftment. Patients with primary or recurrent CDI were prospectively enrolled to receive oral FMT. Changes in the bacterial and fungal communities were characterized prior to and up to 6 months following treatment. A total of 37 patients with CDI (15 primary, 22 recurrent) were treated with 6 capsules each containing 0.35-g lyophilized stool extract. A total of 33 patients (89%) had sustained CDI cure, of whom 3 required a second course. There were no safety signals identified. FMT significantly increased bacterial diversity and shifted composition toward donor profiles in responders but not in nonresponders, with robust donor contribution observed to 6 months following FMT (P < 0.001). Responders showed consistent decreases in Enterobacteriaceae and increases in Faecalibacterium sp. to levels seen in donors. Mycobiome profiling revealed an association with FMT failure and increases in one Penicillium taxon, as well as coexclusion relationships between Candida sp. and bacterial taxa enriched in both donors and responders. Primary CDI was associated with more robust changes in the bacterial community than those with recurrent disease. Oral FMT leads to durable microbial engraftment in patients with primary and recurrent CDI, with several microbial taxa being associated with therapy outcome. Novel coexclusion relationships between bacterial and fungal species support the clinical relevance of transkingdom dynamics. IMPORTANCE Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a substantial health concern worldwide, complicated by patterns of increasing antibiotic resistance that may impact primary treatment. Orally administered fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is efficacious in the management of recurrent CDI, with specific bacterial species known to influence clinical outcomes. To date, little is known about the efficacy of FMT in primary CDI and the impact of the mycobiome on therapeutic outcomes. We performed matched bacterial and fungal sequencing on longitudinal samples from a cohort of patients treated with oral FMT for primary and recurrent CDI. We validated many bacterial signatures following oral therapy, confirmed engraftment of donor microbiome out to 6 months following therapy, and demonstrated coexclusion relationships between Candida albicans and two bacterial species in the gut microbiota, which has potential significance beyond CDI, including in the control of gut colonization by this fungal species.

Objective To examine whether non‐medical switching of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from originator infliximab to a biosimilar (CT‐P13, Inflectra) is safe and clinically non‐inferior to continued treatment with originator infliximab. Design Prospective, open label, multicentre, parallel cohort, non‐inferiority study in seven Australian hospitals over 48 weeks, May 2017 – October 2019. Participants Adults (18 years or older) with IBD receiving maintenance originator infliximab (Remicade) who had been in steroid‐free clinical remission for at least 12 weeks. Intervention Managed program for switching patients in four hospitals from originator to biosimilar infliximab (CT‐P13); patients in three other hospitals continued to receive originator infliximab (control). Main outcome measures Clinical disease worsening requiring infliximab dose escalation or change in therapy. Results The switch group included 204 patients, the control group 141 patients with IBD. Ten patients in the control group (7%) and 16 patients switched to CT‐P13 (8%) experienced clinical deterioration; the adjusted risk difference (control v switch group) was –1.1 percentage points (95% CI, –6.1 to 8.2 percentage points), within our pre‐specified non‐inferiority margin of 15 percentage points. Serious adverse events leading to infliximab discontinuation were infrequent in both the switch (six, 3%) and control (six, 4%) groups. Conclusion Switching patients with IBD from originator to biosimilar infliximab is safe and non‐inferior to continuing treatment with originator infliximab. Moreover, the introduction of biosimilar infliximab, by increasing market competition, has resulted in substantial cost savings for the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

The risk of patients relapsing when switching from 4 to 8-weekly VDZ ∼15% and is similar between CD and UC. Dose-interval decrease recaptures 80% of patients who relapsed. Therapeutic drug monitoring of VDZ may be of clinical relevance.

No abstract

Purpose of the review Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as a potent form of therapeutic microbial manipulation. There is much interest in exploring its potential in conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) where disturbances in the gastrointestinal microbiota play a crucial role in disease pathogenesis. Recent findings There are 4 randomized controlled trials of FMT as induction therapy in ulcerative colitis, with meta-analyses suggesting significant benefit over placebo. Allied microbial studies have identified potential microbial and metabolic predictors of therapeutic efficacy and highlighted the importance of optimizing future donor and patient selection. Recent literature has evaluated the use of complementary microbial manipulation through pre-antibiotics to improve treatment efficacy. Studies have also assessed the durability of FMT response and its use in maintenance therapy of UC. While data on FMT are more limited in Crohn’s disease and pouchitis, cohort and pilot randomized controlled data a now also emerging in these areas.