2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to drought stress differs among Pinus pinea provenances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 106 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experiment, the g s of P. longipes was closer to that of isohydric plants, while that of L. communis was more similar to that of anisohydric plants. Many studies have shown that isohydric tree species often adopt drought avoidance strategies, while anisohydric tree species often adopt drought tolerance strategies under drought stress (Tardieu & Simonneau, 1998; Meinzer et al, 2014; Balekoglu et al, 2023). Plants that adopt drought avoidance strategies typically have a higher WUE (Franks., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiment, the g s of P. longipes was closer to that of isohydric plants, while that of L. communis was more similar to that of anisohydric plants. Many studies have shown that isohydric tree species often adopt drought avoidance strategies, while anisohydric tree species often adopt drought tolerance strategies under drought stress (Tardieu & Simonneau, 1998; Meinzer et al, 2014; Balekoglu et al, 2023). Plants that adopt drought avoidance strategies typically have a higher WUE (Franks., 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%