2012
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to: Comment on ‘Phakic intraocular lenses outcomes and complications: Artisan vs Visian ICL’

Abstract: manufacturer had to withdraw its retractable dog leashes after a recoil injury caused partial blindness in a 13-yearold girl. 4 Subsequently manufacturers have advised securing the dog leash with a secondary security collar. 5 Although this may appear to be an inconvenient second step, the benefits far outweigh the risk of permanent sight loss. It is also important to choose a type of leash that is adjusted to the size, weight, and force of the animal. When using leashes without the secondary security collar, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 4 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?